Use of drugs not listed in the National List of Essential Medicines: Findings from a prescription analysis by the Indian Council of Medical Research-Rational Use of Medicines Centres Network in tertiary care hospitals across India
- PMID: 36722552
- PMCID: PMC10043816
- DOI: 10.4103/ijp.ijp_878_21
Use of drugs not listed in the National List of Essential Medicines: Findings from a prescription analysis by the Indian Council of Medical Research-Rational Use of Medicines Centres Network in tertiary care hospitals across India
Abstract
Background: The concept of listing essential medicines can lead to improved supply and access, more rational prescribing, and lower costs of drugs. However, these benefits hinge on the prescription of drugs from an Essential Medicines List (EML). Several studies have highlighted the problem of underutilization of EMLs by prescribers. Therefore, as part of prescription research by the Indian Council of Medical Research-Rational Use of Medicines Centres Network, we evaluated the extent of prescription of drugs not listed in the National List of Essential Medicines (NLEM).
Materials and methods: Prescriptions of outpatients from participating centers were included after obtaining verbal/written informed consent as approved by the Ethics Committee, and evaluated for prescription of drugs from the NLEM 2015.
Results: Analysis of 4838 prescriptions from 13 tertiary health-care institutes revealed that 2677 (55.33%) prescriptions had at least one non-NLEM drug prescribed. In all, 5215 (31.12%) of the total 16,758 drugs prescribed were not in NLEM. Of these, 2722 (16.24%) were single drugs and 2493 (14.88%) were fixed-dose combinations (FDCs). These comprised 700 different drug products - 346 single drugs and 354 FDCs. The average number of non-NLEM drugs prescribed per prescription was 1.08, while the average number of all drugs prescribed was 3.35 per prescription. It was also found that some of the non-NLEM drugs prescribed had the potential to result in increased cost (for example, levocetirizine), increased adverse effects (dextromethorphan), and less effectiveness (losartan) when compared to their NLEM counterparts. Nonavailability of an essential drug (oral hydroxocobalamin) was another important finding of our study.
Conclusion: This study highlights the extent and pattern of drugs prescribed from outside the NLEM at the tertiary health-care level and the need for training and enhanced awareness among prescribers for greater utilization of the NLEM.
Keywords: Audit; National List of Essential Medicines; drugs; medicine; rational use.
Conflict of interest statement
None
References
-
- World Health Organization. The selection and use of essential medicines: Report of the WHO expert committee, 2002. (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 914) Geneva: World Health Organization; 2003. [Last accessed on 2021 May 21]. Available from https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/bitstream/handle/10665/42620/WH... . - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization. How to investigate Drug use in Health Facilities: Selected Drug Use Indicators. 1993. [Last accessed on 2021 May 21]. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/60519/WHO_DAP_93.1.pdf .
-
- Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. National List of Essential Medicines 2015. [Last accessed on 2021 May 21]. Available from https://main.mohfw.gov.in/fooddrugs/national-list-essentialmedicinesnlem... .
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
