Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;91(1):46-54.

Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project

Affiliations
  • PMID: 36722783

Design and Validation of a Simulation Scenario and Assessment Tool: A Pilot Project

Gaige P Flewelling et al. AANA J. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

In 2016, the National Board of Certification and Recertification for Nurse Anesthetists (NBCRNA) launched a Continued Professional Certification (CPC) Program to promote lifelong learning and to facilitate ongoing professional competency checks for practicing certified registered nurse anesthesiologists (CRNA). The use of simulation-based assessment is currently being studied by the NBCRNA for potential use in the CPC Program. The aim of the pilot project was to create and validate simulation scenarios and assessment tools for potential incorporation into the CPC Program. Using the modified Delphi method, an expert panel of eight CRNAs evaluated the validity of four simulation scenarios and the content validity and reliability of four scenario-specific assessment tools. Each of the eight individual surveys assessing simulation scenario validity and assessment tool validity reached ≥ 75% agreement among the expert panelists. Overall content validity index values for the four assessment tools ranged from 0.960 to 0.993. There was a direct relationship between panelists' scores and level of performance on all returned assessment tools. The expert panel validated four simulation scenarios and four accompanying assessment tools. All scenarios and assessment tools were determined to have high content validity and reliability. Using these scenarios and assessment tools would provide unique advantages over standardized assessment methods.

Keywords: assessment; certification; credentialing; education; simulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Name: Gaige P. Flewelling, DNP, CRNA Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. He is the principal author. Disclosures: None. Name: Bailey D. Augustine, DNP, CRNA Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: None. Name: Jeffrey A. Groom, PhD, CRNA, FSSH Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: None. Name: Suzan Kardong-Edgren, PhD, RN, ANEF, CHSE, FSSH, FAAN Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: None. Name: Virginia C. Simmons, DNP, CRNA, CHSE-A, FAANA, FAAN Contribution: This author made significant contributions to the conception, synthesis, writing, and final editing and approval of the manuscript to justify inclusion as an author. Disclosures: None