Association of Surgical Resident Competency Ratings With Patient Outcomes
- PMID: 36724304
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005157
Association of Surgical Resident Competency Ratings With Patient Outcomes
Abstract
Purpose: Accurate assessment of clinical performance is essential to ensure graduating residents are competent for unsupervised practice. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education milestones framework is the most widely used competency-based framework in the United States. However, the relationship between residents' milestones competency ratings and their subsequent early career clinical outcomes has not been established. It is important to examine the association between milestones competency ratings of U.S. general surgical residents and those surgeons' patient outcomes in early career practice.
Method: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted using a sample of national Medicare claims for 23 common, high-risk inpatient general surgical procedures performed between July 1, 2015, and November 30, 2018 (n = 12,400 cases) by nonfellowship-trained U.S. general surgeons. Milestone ratings collected during those surgeons' last year of residency (n = 701 residents) were compared with their risk-adjusted rates of mortality, any complication, or severe complication within 30 days of index operation during their first 2 years of practice.
Results: There were no associations between mean milestone competency ratings of graduating general surgery residents and their subsequent early career patient outcomes, including any complication (23% proficient vs 22% not yet proficient; relative risk [RR], 0.97, [95% CI, 0.88-1.08]); severe complication (9% vs 9%, respectively; RR, 1.01, [95% CI, 0.86-1.19]); and mortality (5% vs 5%; RR, 1.07, [95% CI, 0.88-1.30]). Secondary analyses yielded no associations between patient outcomes and milestone ratings specific to technical performance, or between patient outcomes and composites of operative performance, professionalism, or leadership milestones ratings ( P ranged .32-.97).
Conclusions: Milestone ratings of graduating general surgery residents were not associated with the patient outcomes of those surgeons when they performed common, higher-risk procedures in a Medicare population. Efforts to improve how milestones ratings are generated might strengthen their association with early career outcomes.
Copyright © 2023 by the Association of American Medical Colleges.
Comment in
-
Using Graduating Surgical Resident Milestone Ratings to Predict Patient Outcomes: A Blunt Instrument for a Complex Problem.Acad Med. 2023 Jul 1;98(7):765-768. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005165. Epub 2023 Feb 3. Acad Med. 2023. PMID: 36745875 Free PMC article.
References
-
- George BC, Bohnen JD, Williams RG, et al.; Procedural Learning and Safety Collaborative (PLSC). Readiness of U.S. general surgery residents for independent practice. Ann Surg. 2017;266:582–594.
-
- Mattar SG, Alseidi AA, Jones DB, et al. General surgery residency inadequately prepares trainees for fellowship: Results of a survey of fellowship program directors. Ann Surg. 2013;258:440–449.
-
- Napolitano LM, Savarise M, Paramo JC, et al. Are general surgery residents ready to practice? A survey of the American College of Surgeons Board of Governors and Young Fellows Association. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;218:1063–1072.
-
- Abbott KL, Krumm AE, Kelley J, et al. Surgical trainee performance and alignment with surgical program director expectations. Ann Surg. 2022;276:e1095–e1100.
-
- The General Surgery Milestone Project. J Grad Med Educ. 2014;6(suppl 1):320–328.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
