Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;13(2):e069562.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069562.

Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway

Affiliations

Time trends in caesarean section rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health: a population-based cohort study of 1 153 789 births in Norway

Katariina Laine et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To study caesarean section (CS) rates and associations with perinatal and neonatal health in Norway during 1999-2018.

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Setting: Medical Birth Registry of Norway.

Participants: 1 153 789 births and 1 174 066 newborns.

Methods: CS, intrapartum, perinatal and neonatal mortality rates expressed as percentages (%) or per mille (‰) with 95% CIs.

Primary and secondary outcome measures: CS rates in the Robson Ten-Group Classification System; intrapartum, perinatal and neonatal mortality rates.

Results: The overall CS rate increased from 12.9% in 1999 to 16.7% in 2008 (p<0.001), and then reduced to 15.8% in 2018 (p<0.001). The largest reductions were observed in Robson groups 2 and 4. In Robson group 2, the planned CS rate decreased from 9.6% in 2007-2008 to 4.6% in 2017-2018, the intrapartum CS rate decreased from 26.6% in 2007-2008 to 22.3% in 2017-2018. In Robson group 4, the planned CS rate decreased from 16.1% in 2007-2008 to 7.6% in 2017-2018, and the intrapartum CS rate decreased from 7.8% in 2007-2008 to 5.2% in 2017-2018.The intrapartum fetal mortality rate decreased from 0.51 per 1000 (‰) in 1999-2000 to 0.14‰ in 2017-2018. Neonatal mortality decreased from 2.52‰ to 1.58‰.

Conclusions: CS rates in Norway increased between 1999 and 2008, followed by a significant reduction between 2008 and 2018. At the same time, fetal and neonatal mortality rates decreased. Norwegian obstetricians and midwives have contributed to maintaining a low CS rate under 17%. These findings indicate that restricting the use of CS is a safe option for perinatal health.

Keywords: Fetal medicine; Maternal medicine; OBSTETRICS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall caesarean rates by year, in %.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intrapartum caesarean rates in Robson groups 1 and 3 by year, in %.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Caesarean rates in Robson groups 2 (A) and 4 (B) by year, in %.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Caesarean rates in Robson group 5 by year, in %.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Caesarean rates in Robson groups 6 (A) and 7 (B) by year, in %.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Caesarean rates in Robson groups 8 (A) and 10 (B) by year, in %.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet 1985;2:436–7. 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)92750-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Molina G, Weiser TG, Lipsitz SR, et al. . Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA 2015;314:2263–70. 10.1001/jama.2015.15553 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betran AP, Ye J, Moller AB, et al. . Trends and projections of caesarean section rates: global and regional estimates. BMJ Glob Health 2021;6:e005671. 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005671 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, et al. . Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018;392:1341–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31928-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, et al. . The increasing trend in caesarean section rates: global, regional and national estimates: 1990-2014. PLoS One 2016;11:e0148343. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types