Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;71(2):476-480.
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1757_22.

Safety and efficacy of low-energy small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: A retrospective analysis

N V Arulmozhi Varman  1 , Aadithreya Varman, Dinesh Balakumar
Affiliations

Safety and efficacy of low-energy small incision lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism: A retrospective analysis

N V Arulmozhi Varman et al. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the safety and efficacy of low-energy settings in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism.

Methods: We included patients aged ≥18 years with the myopia of -0.5 to -10 D and myopic astigmatism of -0.5 to -5 Dcyl in this retrospective case series performed at a private eye hospital in South India. All patients had preoperative best-corrected visual acuity of LogMar 0.0 ± 0, with stable refraction for 1 year and normal corneal topography. Ocular surface disease and other pathology cases were excluded. The repetition rate of the laser was 500 kHz, and the pulse energy was 110 nJ. The lenticule diameter was set at 6.5 mm, cap diameter was 7.20 mm, and intended cap thickness was 110-130 μ. The spot distance was 4.5 μm. All patients were evaluated immediately postoperation and on postoperative days 1, 8, and 30.

Results: Overall, 541 eyes were included. The mean patient age was 25.03 ± 4.1 years. The mean spherical error was -3.76 ± 1.84 Ds. The mean cylinder was -1.24 ± 0.91. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction was -4.22 ±1.94 D. The logMAR on postoperative day 1 was 0.0 ± 0. The mean spherical equivalent at 1 month was 0.28 ± 1.06 D. There was no loss of Snellen's lines after the procedure. The mean spherical equivalent of refraction to the target was 95% within ± 0.50 D. The postoperative astigmatism was within 0.5 Dycl. No intraoperative complications of SMILE including retained lenticule fragments, tears of incision, or improper dissection occurred.

Conclusion: Low-energy settings in SMILE are safe and effective in correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism including high cylinders (>3 Dcyl).

Keywords: Femtosecond; LASIK; SMILE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Graph A: Cumulative Snellen’s chart of the preoperative and postoperative vision. All patients achieved a UDVA of 20/20 by postoperative day 30. Graph B: CDVA and postoperative CDVA at 30 days. No loss of Snellen’s lines. Graph C: No eyes had any change of Snellen’s lines after the procedure
Figure 2
Figure 2
Graph D: Scatterplot of the attempted versus achieved MSE. Graph E: Accuracy of MSE to the target; 95% had it within ±0.50 D. Graph F: Accuracy of the treatment for up to 30 days after the surgery. The results were maintained at 30 days postoperation
Figure 3
Figure 3
Graph G: Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism, and all patients had postoperative astigmatism within 0.5 Dcyl. Graph H: Difference between target-induced astigmatism and surgically induced astigmatism. Graph I: Angle of error of correction of astigmatism. Eighty-eight percent of eyes had an angle between −5 and 5 degrees
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism:Safety and efficacy. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–87. - PubMed
    1. Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1249–61. - PubMed
    1. Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M. Advances in refractive surgery:Microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability, and biomechanical stability. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2006;17:368–72. - PubMed
    1. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Lewis TA, Gobbe M, Moore J, et al. Long-term visual and refractive outcomes after LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism from -8.00 to -14.25 D. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:290–7. - PubMed
    1. Cennamo G, Menna F, Sinisi F, Cennamo G, Breve MA, Napolitano P, et al. Twenty-year follow-up of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy:A retrospective observational study. Ophthalmol Ther. 2020;9:917–27. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms