Uptake of medical male circumcision with household-based testing, and the association of traditional male circumcision and HIV infection
- PMID: 36727597
- PMCID: PMC10023451
- DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000003463
Uptake of medical male circumcision with household-based testing, and the association of traditional male circumcision and HIV infection
Abstract
Objectives: Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is an important component of combination HIV prevention. Inclusion of traditionally circumcised HIV negative men in VMMC uptake campaigns may be important if traditional male circumcision is less protective against HIV acquisition than VMMC.
Methods: We used data from the HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) 071 (PopART) study. This cluster-randomized trial assessed the impact of a combination prevention package on population-level HIV incidence in 21 study communities in Zambia and South Africa. We evaluated uptake of VMMC, using a two-stage analysis approach and used discrete-time survival analysis to evaluate the association between the types of male circumcision and HIV incidence.
Results: A total of 10 803 HIV-negative men with self-reported circumcision status were included in this study. At baseline, 56% reported being uncircumcised, 26% traditionally circumcised and 18% were medically circumcised. During the PopART intervention, 11% of uncircumcised men reported uptake of medical male circumcision. We found no significant difference in the uptake of VMMC in communities receiving the PopART intervention package and standard of care {adj. rate ratio=1·10 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82, 1.50, P = 0.48]}. The rate of HIV acquisition for medically circumcised men was 70% lower than for those who were uncircumcised adjusted hazard ratio (adjHR) = 0.30 (95% CI 0.16-0.55; P < 0.0001). There was no difference in rate of HIV acquisition for traditionally circumcised men compared to those uncircumcised adjHR = 0.84 (95% CI 0.54, 1.31; P = 0.45).
Conclusions: Household-based delivery of HIV testing followed by referral for medical male circumcision did not result in substantial VMMC uptake. Traditional circumcision is not associated with lower risk of HIV acquisition.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests:
CF reports payments from the Public Health Company and the University of Oxford.GH has funding from the London School of Tropical Medicine. NM reports the HPTN Scholars grant. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures

References
-
- Weiss H, World Health Organization, Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, editors. Male circumcision: global trends and determinants of prevalence, safety, and acceptability. Geneva: World Health Organization : UNAIDS; 2008.
-
- Gray RH, Kigozi G, Serwadda D, Makumbi F, Watya S, Nalugoda F, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in men in Rakai, Uganda: a randomised trial. The Lancet 2007; 369:657–666. - PubMed
-
- Bailey RC, Moses S, Parker CB, Agot K, Maclean I, Krieger JN, et al. Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Lond Engl 2007; 369:643–656. - PubMed
-
- WHO ∣ New data on male circumcision and HIV prevention: policy and programme implications. WHO. https://www.who.int/hiv/pub/meetingreports/mc_montreux_march07/en/ (accessed 8 Jul2021).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical