Is early bowel resection better than medical therapy for ileocolonic Crohn's disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 36727928
- DOI: 10.1111/codi.16502
Is early bowel resection better than medical therapy for ileocolonic Crohn's disease? A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Aim: There is emerging evidence supporting early bowel resection (EBR) for ileocaecal Crohn's disease (CD) as an alternative to conventional escalation of medical therapy (MT). Here, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the outcomes of EBR with those of MT in ileocolonic CD, with a focus on ileocaecal disease.
Methodology: The MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched for studies reporting the outcomes of EBR versus MT for ileocolonic CD. The Cochrane tools for assessment of risk of bias were used to assess the methodological quality of studies.
Results: Nine records (from 8 studies, with a total of 1867 patients) were included in the analysis. Six studies were observational and two were randomised controlled trials. There was a reduced need for drug therapy in the EBR arm. The rate of intestinal resection at 5 years was 7.8% in the EBR arm and 25.4% in the MT group with a pooled OR of 0.32 (95% CI 0.19, 0.54; p < 0.0001). The EBR group had a longer resection-free survival (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.38, 0.83; p = 0.004). These outcomes were consistent in a subgroup analysis of patients with ileocaecal disease. Morbidity and quality of life scores were similar across the two groups.
Conclusion: EBR is associated with a more stable remission compared to initial MT for ileocolonic Crohn's disease. There is enough evidence to support EBR as an alternative to escalation of MT in selected patients with limited ileocaecal disease.
Keywords: Crohn's disease; early bowel resection; ileocaecal disease; medical therapy.
© 2023 The Authors. Colorectal Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Pasvol TJ, Horsfall L, Bloom S, Segal AW, Sabin C, Field N, et al. Incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in UK primary care: a population-based cohort study. BMJ Open. 2020;10(7):e036584. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036584
-
- Silverberg MS, Satsangi J, Ahmad T, Arnott IDR, Bernstein CN, Brant SR, et al. Toward an integrated clinical, molecular and serological classification of inflammatory bowel disease: report of a working party of the 2005 Montreal world congress of gastroenterology. Can J Gastroenterol. 2005;19:5A-36A. https://doi.org/10.1155/2005/269076
-
- de Groof EJ, Rossen NGM, van Rhijn B, Karregat EP, Boonstra K, Hageman I, et al. Burden of disease and increasing prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease in a population-based cohort in The Netherlands. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;28(9):1065-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/MEG.0000000000000660
-
- Golovics PA, Mandel MD, Lovasz BD, Lakatos PL. Inflammatory bowel disease course in Crohn's disease: is the natural history changing? World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(12):3198-207. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i12.3198
-
- Gionchetti P, Dignass A, Danese S, Magro Dias FJ, Rogler G, Lakatos PL, et al. 3rd European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease 2016: part 2: surgical management and special situations. J Crohns Colitis. 2017;11(2):135-49. https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjw169
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
