Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration Performed by Neonatologists With Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine to Treat Fluid Overload During Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Case Series
- PMID: 36728157
- DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003177
Continuous Venovenous Hemofiltration Performed by Neonatologists With Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine to Treat Fluid Overload During Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: A Case Series
Abstract
Objectives: A new device is available for neonates needing extracorporeal renal replacement therapy. We reviewed the use of this device (in continuous venovenous hemofiltration [CVVH] mode) in term or preterm neonates affected by multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) with fluid overload.
Design: Case series.
Setting: Academic specialized referral neonatal ICU (NICU) with expertise on advanced life support and monitoring.
Patients: Neonates with MODS and fluid overload despite conventional treatments and receiving at least one CVVH session.
Intervention: CVVH with the Cardio-Renal Pediatric Dialysis Emergency Machine.
Measurements and main results: Ten (three preterm) neonates were treated using 18 consecutive CVVH sessions. All patients were in life-threatening conditions and successfully completed the CVVH treatments, which almost always lasted 24 hr/session, without major side effects. Three neonates survived and were successfully discharged from hospital with normal follow-up. CVVH reduced fluid overload (before versus after represented as a weight percentage: 23.5% [12-34%] vs 14.6% [8.2-24.1%]; p = 0.006) and lactate (before versus after: 4.6 [2.9-12.1] vs 2.9 mmol/L [2.3-5.5 mmol/L]; p = 0.001). CVVH also improved the Pa o2 to Fio2 (before vs after: 188 mm Hg [118-253 mm Hg] vs 240 mm Hg [161-309 mm Hg]; p = 0.003) and oxygenation index (before vs after: 5.9 [3.8-14.6] vs 4 [2.9-11]; p = 0.002). The average cost of CVVH in these patients was minor (≈3%) in comparison with the median total cost of NICU care per patient.
Conclusions: We have provided CVVH to critically ill term and preterm neonates with MODS. CVVH improved fluid overload and oxygenation. The cost of CVVH was minimal compared with the overall cost of neonatal intensive care.
Copyright © 2023 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. De Luca has served as consultant and lecturer for MEDTRONIC inc. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Watson RS, Crow SS, Hartman ME, et al.: Epidemiology and outcomes of pediatric multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017; 18:S4–S16
-
- Graciano AL, Balko JA, Rahn DS, et al.: The Pediatric Multiple Organ Dysfunction Score (P-MODS): Development and validation of an objective scale to measure the severity of multiple organ dysfunction in critically ill children. Crit Care Med 2005; 33:1484–1491
-
- Ronco C, Ricci Z, Husain-Syed F: From multiple organ support therapy to extracorporeal organ support in critically ill patients. Blood Purif 2019; 48:99–105
-
- Weiss SL, Peters MJ, Alhazzani W, et al.: Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children. Intensive Care Med 2020; 46:10–67
-
- Bestati N, Leteurtre S, Duhamel A, et al.: Differences in organ dysfunctions between neonates and older children: A prospective, observational, multicenter study. Crit Care 2010; 14:R202
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical