Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;37(6):294-298.
doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000002572.

Outcomes After Acute Versus Staged Fixation of Complete Articular Tibial Plafond Fractures

Christopher D Flanagan  1 , Reuben C Lufrano, Lazaro Mesa, David Watson, Anjan R Shah, Benjamin J Maxson, Anthony Infante, David Donohue, Katheryne Downes, Roy W Sanders, Hassan R Mir
Affiliations

Outcomes After Acute Versus Staged Fixation of Complete Articular Tibial Plafond Fractures

Christopher D Flanagan et al. J Orthop Trauma. .

Abstract

Objective: To determine the outcomes after acute versus staged fixation of complete articular tibial plafond fractures.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Single Level 1 Trauma center.

Participants: 98 skeletally mature patients with OTA/AO 43C type fractures who underwent definitive fixation with plate and screw constructs and had a minimum 6 months of follow-up.

Intervention: Acute open reduction internal fixation (aORIF) versus staged (sORIF) definitive fixation.

Main outcome measurement: Rates of wound dehiscence/necrosis and deep infection.

Results: Acute (N = 40) versus staged (N = 58) ORIF groups had comparable rates of vascular disease, renal disease, and substance/nicotine use, but aORIF patients had higher rates of diabetes mellitus (10% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), which correlated with higher American Society of Anaesthesiologist scores (>American Society of Anaesthesiologist 3: 37.5% vs. 13.8%, P = 0.02). Both groups achieved anatomic/good reductions, as determined by postoperative CT scans, at rates greater than 90%; however, the sORIF group required modestly longer operative times to achieve this outcome (aORIF vs. sORIF: 121 vs. 146 minutes, P = 0.02). Postoperatively, both groups had similar rates of wound dehiscence (2.5% vs. 6.9%, P = 0.65), superficial infections (10% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.39), and deep infections (10% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.99). While the injury pattern itself required free flap coverage in 1 patient in each group, unplanned free flap coverage occurred in 10.0% and 10.3% of aORIF and sORIF groups, respectively. Overall, rates of unplanned reoperations, excluding ankle arthrodesis, did not differ between groups (aORIF vs. sORIF:12.5% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.13).

Conclusions: In select patients managed by fellowship-trained orthopaedic traumatologists, acute definitive pilon fixation can produce acceptable outcomes.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Middleton SD, Guy P, Roffey DM, et al. Long term trajectory of recovery following pilon fracture fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2021;36:e250–e254.
    1. Rüedi T. Fractures of the lower end of the tibia into the ankle joint: results 9 years after open reduction and internal fixation. Injury. 1973;5:130–134.
    1. Teeny SM, Wiss DA. Open reduction and internal fixation of tibial plafond fractures. Variables contributing to poor results and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993;292:108–117.
    1. McFerran MA, Smith SW, Boulas HJ, Schwartz HS. Complications encountered in the treatment of pilon fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1992;6:195–200.
    1. Kline AJ, Gruen GS, Pape HC, et al. Early complications following the operative treatment of pilon fractures with and without diabetes. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:1042–1047.

MeSH terms