Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;31(5):239-244.
doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-01023. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

External Fixator Usage and Delayed MRI Scans: A National Survey Study

Noelle L Van Rysselberghe  1 , Andrew T Fithian, Ho Bin Kim, Jeffrey C Sung, Benjamin B Chou, Julius A Bishop, Michael J Gardner, Justin F Lucas, Garin G Hecht
Affiliations

External Fixator Usage and Delayed MRI Scans: A National Survey Study

Noelle L Van Rysselberghe et al. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: To report the current state of institutional protocols regarding the use of MRI in patients with external fixation devices (EFDs) in the United States.

Design: National Survey Study.

Participants: Practicing orthopaedic surgeons frequenting the Orthopaedic Trauma Association website were invited to participate in this study.

Results: Sixty-two eligible orthopaedic surgeons completed the survey. No respondents reported any known harmful complications of MRI use with an EFD. Eight respondents (13%) reported at least one early scan termination because of mild warmth or vibration without any lasting complications. Fifty-six respondents (90%) reported delays to care related to MRI-EFD compatibility labeling, and 27 respondents (48%) reported delayed MRI scans in every patient with an EFD who needed one. Twenty-six surgeons (42%) had modified their practice in some way in response to these barriers. Examples include delaying EFD placement until after MRI, relying on CT arthrograms over MRI for surgical planning, and taking patients to the operating room to remove EFDs temporarily and then replace them. Nineteen respondents (31%) had developed formal protocols to address this issue, but having a written protocol was not associated with any decrease in delays ( P = 0.119). Eighty-nine percent of respondents thought there was a need for a national consensus guideline on this issue.

Conclusion: Despite no previous reports of harmful complications, MRI utilization is frequently delayed or prevented in patients with EFDs in place. This is a pervasive problem nationally, which persists despite the implementation of written institutional protocols. Additional research is needed, potentially at the national level, to address this common issue.

Level of evidence: V.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kumar R, Lerski RA, Gandy S, Clift BA, Abboud RJ: Safety of orthopedic implants in magnetic resonance imaging: An experimental verification. J Orthop Res 2006;24:1799-1802.
    1. Cannada LK, Herzenberg JE, Hughes PM, Belkoff S: Safety and image artifact of external fixators and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1995;317:206-214.
    1. Luechinger R, Boesiger P, Disegi JA: Safety evaluation of large external fixation clamps and frames in a magnetic resonance environment. J Biomed Mater Res B 2007;82B:17-22.
    1. Davison BL, Cantu RV, Van Woerkom S: The magnetic attraction of lower extremity external fixators in an MRI suite. J Orthop Trauma 2004;18:24-27.
    1. Ryan S, Moon AS, Gordon M, et al.: External fixation devices within the magnetic resonance imaging bore: A safety and radiologic Analysis. J Orthop Trauma 2021;35:e25-e30.

LinkOut - more resources