Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Study of Masseter Muscle Segmentation in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia
- PMID: 36728424
- DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000009105
Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence Study of Masseter Muscle Segmentation in Patients With Hemifacial Microsomia
Abstract
Background: Hemifacial microsomia (HFM) is one of the most common congenital craniofacial condition often accompanied by masseter muscle involvement. U-Net neural convolution network for masseter segmentation is expected to achieve an efficient evaluation of masseter muscle.
Methods: A database was established with 108 patients with HFM from June 2012 to June 2019 in our center. Demographic data, OMENS classification, and 1-mm layer thick 3-dimensional computed tomography were included. Two radiologists manually segmented masseter muscles in a consensus reading as the ground truth. A test set of 20 cases was duplicated into 2 groups: an experimental group with the intelligent algorithm and a control group with manual segmentation. The U-net follows the design of 3D RoI-Aware U-Net with overlapping window strategy and references to our previous study of masseter segmentation in a healthy population system. Sorensen dice-similarity coefficient (DSC) muscle volume, average surface distance, recall, and time were used to validate compared with the ground truth.
Results: The mean DSC value of 0.794±0.028 for the experiment group was compared with the manual segmentation (0.885±0.118) with α=0.05 and a noninferiority margin of 15%. In addition, higher DSC was reported in patients with milder mandible deformity ( r =0.824, P <0.05). Moreover, intelligent automatic segmentation takes only 6.4 seconds showing great efficiency.
Conclusions: We first proposed a U-net neural convolutional network and achieved automatic segmentation of masseter muscles in patients with HFM. It is a great attempt at intelligent diagnosis and evaluation of craniofacial diseases.
Copyright © 2023 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Poole M. Hemifacial microsomia. World J Surg 1989;13:396–400
-
- David DJ, Mahatumarat C, Cooter RD. Hemifacial microsomia: a multisystem classification. Plast Reconstr Surg 1987;80:525–535
-
- Horgan JE, Padwa BL, LaBrie RA, et al. OMENS-Plus: analysis of craniofacial and extracraniofacial anomalies in hemifacial microsomia. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:405–412
-
- Tan A, Chai Y, Mooi W, et al. Computer-assisted surgery in therapeutic strategy distraction osteogenesis of hemifacial microsomia: accuracy and predictability. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019;47:204–218
-
- Huisinga-Fischer CE, Vaandrager JM, Zonneveld FW, et al. Precision and accuracy of CT-based measurements of masticatory muscles in patients with hemifacial microsomia. Dentomaxillofac Radiol . 2004;33:12–16.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources