Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language
- PMID: 36728715
- DOI: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000001232
Outcomes in pediatric anesthesia: towards a universal language
Abstract
Purpose of review: The identification of valid, well defined and relevant outcomes is fundamental to provide a reliable and replicable measure that can be used to improve quality of clinical care and research output. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on what the pediatric anesthesia research community is pursuing on standardized and validated outcomes.
Recent findings: Several initiatives by different research groups have been established during the last years. They all aim to find validated outcomes using the standardized methodology of COMET ( https://www.comet-initiative.org/ ). These initiatives focus on clinical and research outcomes on the field of anesthesia, perioperative medicine, pain and sedation in pediatric age.
Summary: Clinical outcomes are measurements of changes in health, function or quality of life and they help evaluating quality of care. In order for them to be relevant in quantifying quality improvement, they need to be well defined, standardized and consistent across trials. A great effort from researchers has been made towards the identification of set of outcomes with these features.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Last J. A dictionary of epidemiology. 3rd ed.New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1995.
-
- Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials 2017; 18:280.
-
- Joannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2005; 2:e124.
-
- Joannidis JP. How to make more published research true. PLoS Med 2014; 11:e1001747.
-
- Macleod MR, Michie S, Roberts I, et al. Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing waste. Lancet 2014; 383:101–104.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
