Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2023 Mar 1;51(3):e73-e80.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005775. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

Association Between Length of Storage of Transfused Packed RBC Units and Outcome of Surgical Critically Ill Adults: A Subgroup Analysis of the Age of Blood Evaluation Randomized Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Association Between Length of Storage of Transfused Packed RBC Units and Outcome of Surgical Critically Ill Adults: A Subgroup Analysis of the Age of Blood Evaluation Randomized Trial

Anab Rebecca Lehr et al. Crit Care Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: The Age of Blood Evaluation (ABLE) study reported no clinical benefit in fresher compared with standard delivery RBC units (length of storage: 6.9 ± 4.1 vs 22.0 ± 8.4 d, respectively). Perioperative patients are often anemic, at risk of blood loss, and more exposed to RBC transfusions. We address the question whether fresh RBC units are safer than standard delivery RBC units in perioperative ICU patients.

Design: Subgroup analysis of surgical nontrauma adults enrolled in the ABLE randomized controlled trial.

Setting: ICUs.

Patients: Three hundred twenty surgical patients among the 2,510 ICU adults recruited in the ABLE study who had a request for a first RBC transfusion in the first week in ICU stay and an anticipated length of mechanical ventilation greater than or equal to 48 hours. We included perioperative patients but excluded elective cardiac surgery and trauma.

Interventions: Surgical participants were allocated to receive either RBC units stored less than or equal to 7 days or standard issue RBC.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. One hundred seventy-two perioperative patients were allocated to the fresh and 148 to the standard group. Baseline data were similar. The length of storage was 7.2 ± 6.4 in fresh and 20.6 ± 8.4 days in standard group ( p < 0.0001). The 90-day mortality was 29.7% and 28.4%, respectively (absolute risk difference: 0.01; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.11; p = 0.803). No significant differences were observed for all secondary outcomes, including 6-month mortality, even after adjustment for age, country, and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score.

Conclusions: There was no evidence that fresh red cells improved outcomes as compared to standard issue red cells in critically ill surgical patients, consistent with other patients enrolled in the ABLE trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Lehr disclosed government work. Drs. Lehr and Hébert received support for article research from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). Drs. Hébert’s and Lacroix’s institutions received funding from the CIHR. Dr. Sabri disclosed work for hire. Dr. Fergusson disclosed that he does not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Comment in

References

    1. Lacroix J, Hebert P, Fergusson D, et al.; ABLE study group: The age of blood evaluation (ABLE) randomized controlled trial: Study design. Transfus Med Rev. 2011; 25:197–205
    1. Lacroix J, Hebert PC, Fergusson D, et al.; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group: The ABLE study: A randomized controlled trial on the efficacy of fresh red cell units to improve the outcome of transfused critically ill adults. Transfus Clin Biol. 2015; 22:107–111
    1. Koch CG, Li L, Sessler DI, et al.: Duration of red-cell storage and complications after cardiac surgery. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358:1229–1239
    1. Sowers N, Froese PC, Erdogan M, et al.: Impact of the age of stored blood on trauma patient mortality: A systematic review. Can J Surg. 2015; 58:335–342
    1. Cartotto R, Taylor SL, Holmes JH, et al.: The effects of storage age of blood in massively transfused burn patients: A secondary analysis of the randomized transfusion requirement in burn care evaluation study. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46:e1097–e1104

Publication types

Grants and funding