Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Apr 1;43(4):547-554.
doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003728.

INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP FOR SMALL-SIZED (<250 µ m) FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE : Anatomical and Functional Outcome

Affiliations

INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP FOR SMALL-SIZED (<250 µ m) FULL-THICKNESS MACULAR HOLE : Anatomical and Functional Outcome

Lorenzo Iuliano et al. Retina. .

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the anatomical and functional outcome of small (<250 µ m) and medium (250-400 µ m) full-thickness macular holes (FTMHs) treated with internal limiting membrane (ILM) inverted flap (IF) or with the standard technique.

Methods: Retrospective longitudinal analysis of successfully operated eyes with small or intermediate FTMH. Outcome measures were best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), microperimetric sensitivity (with fixation stability), and restoration of the external limiting membrane (ELM) and ellipsoid zone (EZ) at 6 months.

Results: Fifty small and 50 intermediate eyes with FTMH were included, half of each group (25) treated with the standard technique, half with IF. BCVA increased in every subgroup, similarly within the same stage regardless the technique. Small FTMH treated with IF disclosed inferior foveal sensitivity at 6 months (20.79 ± 0.48 dB) compared with the standard technique (21.51 ± 0.79 dB; P = 0.0035). At 1 month, inferior rates of ELM (24%) and EZ (24%) restoration were also found, compared with the standard technique (56% ELM P = 0.0420; 64% EZ P = 0.0095). At 6 months, ELM and EZ were similarly restored.

Conclusion: The surgical repair of small FMTH with ILM IF seem to delay the foveal structural repair and to gain an inferior foveal sensitivity compared to the standard technique.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kelly NE, Wendel RT. Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:654–659.
    1. Eckardt C, Eckardt U, Groos S, et al. Removal of the internal limiting membrane in macular holes. Clinical and morphological findings. Ophthalmologe 1997;94:545–551.
    1. Rahimy E, McCannel CA. Impact of internal limiting membrane peeling on macular hole reopening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Retina 2016;36:679–687.
    1. Rizzo S, Tartaro R, Barca F, et al. Internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted flap technique for treatment of full-thickness macular holes a comparative study in a large series of patients. Retina 2018;38:S73–S78.
    1. Marques RE, Sousa DC, Leal I, et al. Complete ILM peeling versus inverted flap technique for macular hole surgery: a meta-analysis. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2020;51:187–195.

LinkOut - more resources