Fostering "Reflection-On-Practice" Through a Multisource Feedback and Peer Coaching Pilot Program
- PMID: 36729010
- DOI: 10.1097/CEH.0000000000000483
Fostering "Reflection-On-Practice" Through a Multisource Feedback and Peer Coaching Pilot Program
Abstract
Introduction: Reflective practice involves thinking about one's practice and often involves using data to effect such reflection. Multisource feedback (MSF) involves evaluation by peers, patients, and coworkers. Coaching has been identified as a key aspect of MSF with peer coaching involving two or more colleagues working together to reflect on current practices and share ideas. We introduced a pilot MSF and peer coaching program with a goal to evaluate its effect on fostering reflective practice.
Methods: Physician participants completed a 360-degree assessment of their practices, followed by peer coaching sessions. Peer coaches were oriented to an evidence-based theory-driven feedback model (R2C2) to support coaching skills development. A mixed-methods evaluation study was undertaken, including pre to post surveys of readiness for self-directed learning, a postevaluation survey of participant satisfaction, and semistructured participant interviews.
Results: Thirty four (N = 34) participants completed the 360-degree assessment, and 22 participants took part in two coaching meetings. Respondents reported significant improvement to aspects of their readiness for self-directed learning ( P <.05), including knowing about learning strategies to achieve key learning goals, knowing about resources to support one's own learning, and being able to evaluate one's learning outcomes. Overall, respondents felt empowered to "reflect" on their practices, affirm what they were doing well, and, for some, identify opportunities for further and ongoing professional development.
Discussion: MSF and peer coaching emerged as key elements in enabling reflective practice by facilitating reflection on one's practice and conversations with one's peers to affirm strengths and opportunities for strengthening practice through self-directed professional development.
Copyright © 2024 The Alliance for Continuing Education in the Health Professions, the Association for Hospital Medical Education, and the Society for Academic Continuing Medical Education.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Campbell C, Silver I, Sherbino J, et al., International CBME Collaborators. Competency-based continuing professional development. Med Teach. 2010; 32: 657–662.
-
- Fleet LJ, Curran VR, Whitton C. NL360+: A Multisource Feedback & Peer-Coaching Pilot Program: Final Evaluation Report. Newfoundland, Canada: Memorial University of Newfoundland; 2021. Available at: http://research.library.mun.ca/id/eprint/15498 . Accessed September 19, 2022.
-
- Moja L, Kwag KH. Point of care information services: a platform for self-directed continuing medical education for front line decision makers. Postgrad Med J. 2015; 91: 83–91.
-
- Lockyer J, Bursey F, Richardson D, et al., International CBME Collaborators. Competency-based medical education and continuing professional development: a conceptualization for change. Med Teach. 2017; 39: 617–622.
-
- Lockyer J, Sargeant J. Multisource feedback. In: Boud D, Molloy E (eds) Effective Feedback in Higher and Professional Education. Oxford, UK: Routledge; 2012: 158–173.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
