Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar-Apr;48(2):62-68.
doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000891.

OB HUB: Remote Electronic Fetal Monitoring Surveillance

OB HUB: Remote Electronic Fetal Monitoring Surveillance

Deb Lowery et al. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2023 Mar-Apr.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this project was to implement a remote fetal surveillance unit with increased vigilance and timelier responses to electronic fetal monitor tracings to improve neonatal outcomes and increase safety.

Methods: A pilot project, OB HUB, facilitated implementation of a centralized remote fetal surveillance unit including artificial intelligence software and nurse experts dedicated to fetal monitoring interpretation. A telemetry room was established. Notification parameters were created to promote consistent communication between OB HUB nurses and bedside nurses. Outcomes for term neonates included body cooling, arterial cord pH less than 7.0, Apgar scores less than 7 at 5 minutes, emergency cesarean births, and cesarean births. Surveys were used to evaluate team perceptions of fetal safety.

Results: There were 2,407 births 6 months pre OB HUB implementation and 2,582 births during the 6-month trial, for a total sample of 4,989 births included in the analysis. Six births (0.25%) resulted in cooling prior to implementation and 2 (0.08%) cooling events occurred during the trial; these differences were not significant (p = .10). There were no significant differences between groups for neonatal outcomes. Average level of safety perceived by nurses and providers remained relatively unchanged when comparing pre- and postimplementation survey results; however, of those responding, 78.8% of nurses indicated the OB HUB improved safety.

Clinical implications: There were few adverse events in either group, thus it was a challenge to demonstrate statistically significant improvement in neonatal outcomes even with a sample of nearly 5,000 births. A larger sample is needed to support clinical utility. The OB HUB was perceived favorably by most of the L&D nurses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2017). Monitoring for perinatal safety: Electronic fetal monitoring . Publication: 17-0003-18-EF. www.ahrq.gov/hai/tools/perinatal-care/modules/strategies/safe-electronic...
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2019). TeamSTEPPS fundamentals course (Module 3). https://www.ahrq.gov/teamstepps/instructor/fundamentals/module3/igcommun...
    1. Alfirevic Z., Devane D., Gyte G. M., Cuthbert A. (2017). Continuous cardiotocography (CTG) as a form of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) for fetal assessment during labour. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews , 2(2), CD006066. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006066.pub3 - DOI
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2009, reaffirmed 2019). Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: Nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles (Practice Bulletin No. 106). Obstetrics & Gynecology , 114(1), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. (2015). Ob-gyn professional liability survey results . https://www.acog.org/practice-management/professional-liability/ob-gyn-p...

LinkOut - more resources