Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis
- PMID: 36730180
- DOI: 10.1002/uog.26171
Diagnosis and management of isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect): a SWOT analysis
Abstract
The purpose of this State-of-the-Art Review was to provide a strategic analysis, in terms of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats (SWOT analysis), of the current evidence regarding the management of uterine isthmocele (Cesarean scar defect). Strengths include the fact that isthmocele can be diagnosed on two-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound, and that surgical repair may restore natural fertility potential and prevent secondary infertility, as well as reduce the risk of miscarriage and other obstetric complications. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence regarding the best diagnostic method and criteria, as well as the potential benefits of surgical repair with respect to fertility. There is a need for experienced surgeons skilled in the various isthmocele repair techniques. Isthmocele repair does not prevent the need for Cesarean delivery in subsequent pregnancies. There is increasing awareness regarding the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound in diagnosing isthmocele. This may lead to surgical correction and prevention of obstetric and perinatal complications in subsequent pregnancies, including Cesarean scar pregnancy. Regarding threats, the existence of different surgical techniques means that there is a risk of selecting an inadequate approach if the type of isthmocele and the patient's characteristics are not considered. There is a risk of overtreatment when asymptomatic defects are repaired surgically. Finally, there is an absence of cost-effectiveness analyses to justify routine repair. Thus, while there are many data suggesting that isthmocele has an adverse effect on both natural fertility and the outcome of assisted reproduction techniques, high-quality evidence to support surgical isthmocele repair in all asymptomatic patients desiring future fertility are lacking. There is increasing agreement to recommend hysteroscopic repair of isthmocele as a first-line approach as long as the residual myometrial thickness is at least 2.5-3.0 mm. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
© 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic repair of a symptomatic post-cesarean section isthmocele: a video case report.Fertil Steril. 2017 Jun;107(6):e17-e18. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 5. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 28483506
-
Demonstration of Isthmocele Surgical Repair.J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Mar;28(3):389-390. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.09.007. Epub 2020 Sep 11. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 32920144
-
Mini-invasive transvaginal repair of isthmocele: a video case report.Fertil Steril. 2019 Apr;111(4):828-830. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Mar 8. Fertil Steril. 2019. PMID: 30853089
-
Isthmocele: an overview of diagnosis and treatment.Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019 Jun 3;65(5):714-721. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.5.714. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019. PMID: 31166450 Review.
-
Current surgical treatment of uterine isthmocele: an update of existing literature.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jan;311(1):13-24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07880-w. Epub 2024 Dec 16. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39680143 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of clinical effectiveness and subsequent fertility between hysteroscopic resection and vaginal repair in patients with cesarean scar defect: a prospective observational study.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023 Dec 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12958-023-01169-4. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2023. PMID: 38082355 Free PMC article.
-
Extragenital endometriosis associated with uterine scar defects.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025 Mar 31;26:100386. doi: 10.1016/j.eurox.2025.100386. eCollection 2025 Jun. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2025. PMID: 40236503 Free PMC article.
-
Indocyanine green (ICG) imaging: case report of innovative isthmocele diagnosis and repair in a post-ablation patient and literature review.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025 Jun 24. doi: 10.1007/s00404-025-08071-x. Online ahead of print. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 40550873
-
Sonographic Assessment of Isthmocele and Its Obstetric Complications in Subsequent Pregnancies: A Pictorial Review.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024 Jul 19;35(1):159-168. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788588. eCollection 2025 Jan. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2024. PMID: 39697515 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of caesarean scar defects on the success of assisted human reproduction: the NICHE-ART prospective French cohort study protocol.BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 7;14(12):e092011. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-092011. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 39645254 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gubbini G, Casadio P, Marra E. Resectoscopic correction of the “isthmocele” in women with postmenstrual abnormal uterine bleeding and secondary infertility. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 172-175.
-
- Boerma T, Ronsmans C, Melesse DY, Barros AJD, Barros FC, Juan L, Moller AB, Say L, Hosseinpoor AR, Yi M, de Lyra Rabello Neto D, Temmerman M. Global epidemiology of use of and disparities in caesarean sections. Lancet 2018; 392: 1341-1348.
-
- Donnez O. Cesarean scar defects: management of an iatrogenic pathology whose prevalence has dramatically increased. Fertil Steril 2020; 113: 704-716.
-
- Gurol-Urganci I, Bou-Antoun S, Lim CP, Cromwell DA, Mahmood TA, Templeton A, van der Meulen JH. Impact of Caesarean section on subsequent fertility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod 2013; 28: 1943-1952.
-
- Vissers J, Hehenkamp W, Lambalk CB, Huirne JA. Post-Caesarean section niche-related impaired fertility: hypothetical mechanisms. Hum Reprod 2020; 35: 1484-1494.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical