Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Mar 1;151(3):388e-397e.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009908. Epub 2022 Nov 19.

Otoplasty: The Belfast Experience. A 10-Year Review of 2333 Ear Outcomes

Kevin M McGarry  1 , Muhammad F Khadim  1 , Michael McBride  1 , Serena Martin  1 , Andrew Moorehead  1 , Abid Rashid  1 , Chris Hill  1 , Brendan Fogarty  1
Affiliations
Review

Otoplasty: The Belfast Experience. A 10-Year Review of 2333 Ear Outcomes

Kevin M McGarry et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Background: "Prominent ear" remains one of the most common referrals to pediatric plastic surgery. The perceived deformity has been corrected using a multitude of techniques for over a century, and significant variation in practice still exists. Recent studies suggesting that cartilage-scoring techniques are associated with more major complications than suture techniques may have led to an adverse international perception of the technique. Thus, waning use of anterior scoring prominent ear correction appears to be occurring. For appropriate cases, the authors have used anterior scoring for over 20 years, with high patient satisfaction and low complication rates. They present a review of all cases and outcomes from 2005 to 2015. The authors believe this is the largest case series of anterior scoring otoplasty published to date.

Methods: All pediatric cases undergoing prominent ear correction from 2005 to 2015 were included in this retrospective case note analysis and follow-up study. Patient demographics, operative details including early and late complications, and postoperative results were analyzed.

Methods: Over a 10-year period, 1199 otoplasties were performed (1134 bilateral, 65 unilateral), for a total of 2333 ear corrections. A total of 1575 ears were corrected using the anterior scoring technique. The remaining cases underwent correction by means of suture only, cartilage reduction, or combination techniques. There was a significantly lower all-cause reoperation rate for anterior scoring compared to suture-only techniques ( P = 0.0039; significant at P < 0.025). There were no reported cases of cartilage necrosis.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that in appropriately selected patients, anterior scoring otoplasty is a low-morbidity procedure. In the authors' institution, when compared to suture techniques, it was associated with a lower rate of complications and reoperation rate than suture-only techniques.

Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Janis JE, Rohrich RJ, Gutowski KA. Otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:60e–72e.
    1. Campobasso P, Belloli G. Protruding ears: the indications for surgical treatment (in Italian). Pediatr Med Chir. 1993;15:151–154.
    1. Macgregor FC. Ear deformities: social and psychological implications. Clin Plast Surg. 1978;5:347–350.
    1. Bradbury ET, Hewison J, Timmons MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45:97–100.
    1. Adamson PA, Strecker HD. Otoplasty techniques. Facial Plast Surg. 1995;11:284–300.