Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 1;48(5):350-357.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004538. Epub 2022 Nov 14.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression: Six-year Follow-Up

Garrett Bullock  1   2 , Christian A Sangio  1 , Edward C Beck  1 , Anirudh K Gowd  1 , Evan Miller  1 , Kerry Danelson  1 , Tadhg James O'Gara  1   3
Affiliations

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Reoperation Rates Following Lumbar Tubular Microdecompression: Six-year Follow-Up

Garrett Bullock et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Objective: To report reoperation rates after lumbar tubular microdecompression (LTM) and to compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) six years after surgery between those who did and did not need revision at the index level.

Summary of background data: Long-term data describing PROs and reoperation rates after LTMs are lacking.

Materials and methods: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis underwent one or more of three LTM procedures. Demographic, PROs [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain], and reoperation data were collected. Failure of an index LTM was defined as any revision surgery at the index level. Revision LTM at a different level was not considered failure. Failure and revision LTM incidence at a different level and cumulative incidence were prospectively collected up to six years. Mixed effects linear regressions with 95% CIs were performed to assess potential differences in ODI and reported VAS back and leg pain between patients that reported failure and those that did not.

Results: A total of 418 patients were included with median follow-up of 3.0 (1.9, 4.1) years. In all, 25% had a reoperation by six years. Sixty-five (16%) failed and 35 (9%) underwent a second LTM at another level. Cumulative failure incidence was 9% within the first two years. Failure patients had a statistically higher ODI [12.1 (95% CI, 3.2, 20.1) and VAS back [2.3 (95% CI, 0.9, 3.8)] and leg pain [1.6 (95% CI, 0.2, 3.1)] throughout follow-up. The overall dural tear rate was 7.2%.

Conclusions: LTM is an effective treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis with sustained six-year PROs. Most failures occur within two years postoperatively and stabilize to 4% yearly incidence by year 5. The yearly incidence of reoperation with LTM stabilizes at 3% by year 6 postoperatively.

Level of evidence: 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Momin AA, Steinmetz MP. Evolution of minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg. 2020;140:622–6
    1. Anderson DG, Patel A, Maltenfort M, et al. Lumbar decompression using a traditional midline approach versus a tubular retractor system: comparison of patient-based clinical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:E320–325.
    1. Fourney DR, Dettori JR, Norvell DC, et al. Does minimal access tubular assisted spine surgery increase or decrease complications in spinal decompression or fusion? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:S57–65.
    1. Misra R, Rath NK. Fully endoscopic lumbar spinal surgery: is it time to change? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;23:101621.
    1. Ma H, Hai B, Yan M, et al. Evaluation of effectiveness of treatment strategies for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of clinical studies. World Neurosurgery. 2021;152:95–106.

LinkOut - more resources