Human Papillomavirus-Associated Head and Neck Malignancies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review

Abstract

Purpose: The proportion of head and neck cancers (HNCs) with human papillomavirus (HPV) positivity in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is poorly characterized. Characterizing this has implications in staging, prognosis, resource allocation, and vaccination policies. This study aims to determine the proportion of HPV-associated HNC in SSA.

Materials and methods: This systematic review included searches from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, African Index Medicus, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online. All English publications reporting the proportion of HNC specimens from SSA patients who tested positive for HPV and/or p16 were included. Study quality was assessed using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment Tool for Case Series Studies.

Results: In this systematic review of 31 studies and 3,850 patients, the overall p16 positivity was 13.6% (41 of 1,037 patients tested) with the highest proportion among oropharyngeal cancers (20.3%, 78 of 384 patients) and the overall HPV polymerase chain reaction positivity was 15.3% (542 of 3,548 samples tested) with the highest proportion among nasopharyngeal cancers (16.5%, 23 of 139 patients). Among the 369 HPV strains detected, the most common genotypes were HPV 16 (226 patients, 59.2%) and HPV 18 (78, 20.4%).

Conclusion: HPV was found to be associated with a significant proportion of HNC in SSA. The genotypes reported suggest that the nine-valent vaccine and gender-neutral vaccination policies should be considered. Given that these studies may not accurately capture prevalence nor causation of HPV in HNC subsites, additional research is needed to provide a more thorough epidemiologic understanding of HPV-associated HNC in SSA, including risk factors and clinical outcomes.

FIG 1

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis flow diagram for study selection and screening process (identification of studies via databases and registers). ^aStudies with possible overlapping patient populations were the ones in which there were studies from the same country, from the same lead author, and from the similar study period and where there was the possibility of overlapping patient cohorts. In these cases, the more recently published paper was included in the analysis. ^bGiven differences in the Google Scholar search engine, a search was performed at the completion of the database.

FIG A1

Number of studies per country. ^aOne study included patients from both Nigeria and Senegal.