Nuclear β-Catenin Expression in the Context of Abnormal p53 Expression Indicates a Nonserous Histotype in Endometrial Carcinoma
- PMID: 36731035
- DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000923
Nuclear β-Catenin Expression in the Context of Abnormal p53 Expression Indicates a Nonserous Histotype in Endometrial Carcinoma
Abstract
The interobserver reproducibility is poor for histotyping within the p53-abnormal molecular category of endometrial carcinomas (ECs); therefore, biomarkers that improve histologic classification are useful. β-catenin has been proposed to have prognostic significance in specific clinicopathologic and molecular contexts. The diagnostic utility for β-catenin expression patterns in determining the histotype of p53-abnormal ECs has not been well studied. We identified ECs molecularly classified as "p53-abnormal." The p53-abnormal classification was assigned when (1) no POLE exonuclease domain hotspot mutations identified, (2) mismatch-repair protein expression was retained, and (3) abnormal p53 expression (null or overexpression) was present. Morphology was re-reviewed and β-catenin immunohistochemistry was scored as abnormal (nuclear) or normal (membranous, non-nuclear). Eighty ECs were identified in the "p53-abnormal" category; 27 (33.75%) were uterine serous carcinomas, and 53 were of nonserous histotype: 28 uterine carcinosarcomas (35%), 16 endometrioid carcinomas (20%), 2 clear cell carcinomas (2.5%), and 7 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology (8.75%). All 27 uterine serous carcinomas demonstrated membranous β-catenin staining. Of the 53 nonserous ECs, 11 (21%) showed abnormal β-catenin expression: 6 endometrioid carcinomas, 4 uterine carcinosarcoma, and 1 high-grade EC with ambiguous morphology. The specificity of abnormal β-catenin expression for nonserous EC is high (100%) but the sensitivity is low (21%) with positive and negative predictive values of 100% and 60%, respectively. Our data shows that abnormal β-catenin expression in the context of p53-abnormal EC is highly specific, but not sensitive, for nonserous ECs and may be of value as part of a panel in classifying high-grade EC, particularly to exclude uterine serous carcinoma when nuclear staining is present.
Copyright © 2022 by the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Correlative Assessment of p53 Immunostaining Patterns and TP53 Mutation Status by Next-Generation Sequencing in High-Grade Endometrial Carcinomas.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2023 Nov 1;42(6):567-575. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000930. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2023. PMID: 36730675
-
Histotype and Grade Are of Prognostic Significance in the No Specific Molecular Prolife Molecular Subtype of Endometrial Carcinoma But Not in POLEmut, MMRd, or p53abn Endometrial Carcinomas: Results From a 2478 Case Series and a Systematic Review of the Literature.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000001120. Online ahead of print. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2025. PMID: 40657843
-
Endometrial Carcinosarcomas are Almost Exclusively of p53abn Molecular Subtype After Exclusion of Mimics.Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2024 Sep 1;43(5):506-514. doi: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000001010. Epub 2024 Feb 2. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2024. PMID: 38303106 Free PMC article.
-
Mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas of the uterine corpus: report of a case series and review of the literature indicating poor prognosis for this subtype of endometrial adenocarcinoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr;146(4):971-983. doi: 10.1007/s00432-019-03123-7. Epub 2020 Jan 11. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2020. PMID: 31927619 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation and reduction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub2. Epub 2014 Dec 17. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25515689
References
-
- Bokhman JV. Two pathogenetic types of endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 1983;15:10–17.
-
- Levine DA. Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma. Nature 2013;497:67–73.
-
- Stelloo E, Bosse T, Nout RA, et al. Refining prognosis and identifying targetable pathways for high-risk endometrial cancer; a TransPORTEC initiative. Mod Pathol 2015;28:836–44.
-
- Talhouk A, McConechy MK, Leung S, et al. A clinically applicable molecular-based classification for endometrial cancers. Br J Cancer 2015;113:299–310.
-
- León‐Castillo A, Gilvazquez E, Nout R, et al. Clinicopathological and molecular characterisation of “multiple‐classifier” endometrial carcinomas. J Pathol 2020;250:312–22.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous