Hospital Volume and Textbook Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- PMID: 36732402
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05609-9
Hospital Volume and Textbook Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Abstract
Background: Hospital volume affects outcomes of patients who underwent resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We sought to assess the impact of minimally invasive hepatectomy (MIH) volume on short- and long-term outcomes among patients with HCC.
Methods: Patients who underwent MIH for HCC from 2010 to 2018 were identified from the National Cancer Database. Multivariable modeling with restricted cubic splines (RCS) was utilized to identify the MIH hospital volume threshold. Textbook outcome (TO) was defined as no conversion to open resection, negative margins after resection (R0), no extended length-of-stay, no readmission, and no 90-day mortality.
Results: Among 3268 patients who underwent MIH for HCC, median age was 65.0 (IQR 59.0-72.0) and the majority was male (n = 2308, 70.6%). MIH hospital volume ranged from 1 to 87 cases, with a median of 13 (IQR 7-23). Overall, 2151 (60.9%) patients achieved TO after resection. While particularly high rates of achievement were found for no 90-day mortality (n = 3106, 95.0%), no readmission (n = 3153, 96.5%), and R0 resection (n = 3,017, 92.3%), other TO components including no conversion to open (n = 2778, 85.0%) and no prolonged LOS (n = 2584, 79.1%) were achieved less frequently. Patients treated at high-volume centers (≥50 MIH cases) were more likely to experience TO (high volume centers, n = 334, 68.7% vs. low volume centers, n = 1656, 59.5%, p < 0.001) and better long-term survival (5-year OS; high volume centers, 64.7% vs. low volume centers, 54.6%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions: MIH hospital volume was associated with a higher likelihood of achieving TO and improved long-term survival among patients undergoing resection of HCC.
Keywords: Hepatectomy; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hospital volume; Minimally invasive surgery; Textbook outcomes.
© 2023. The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract.
References
-
- Birkmeyer JD. Relation of surgical volume to outcome. Ann Surg. 2000;232(5):724-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200011000-00023 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Gani F, Johnston FM, Nelson-Williams H, Cerullo M, Dillhoff ME, Schmidt CR et al. Hospital volume and the costs associated with surgery for pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017;21(9):1411-9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3479-x . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Nathan H, Cameron JL, Choti MA, Schulick RD, Pawlik TM. The volume-outcomes effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: hospital versus surgeon contributions and specificity of the relationship. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208(4):528-38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.01.007 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Krautz C, Nimptsch U, Weber GF, Mansky T, Grutzmann R. Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital morbidity and mortality following pancreatic surgery in Germany. Ann Surg. 2018;267(3):411-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002248 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Spolverato G, Ejaz A, Hyder O, Kim Y, Pawlik TM. Failure to rescue as a source of variation in hospital mortality after hepatic surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(7):836-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.9492 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
