Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Feb 2;14(1):564.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36241-5.

Monitoring and modelling marine zooplankton in a changing climate

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring and modelling marine zooplankton in a changing climate

Lavenia Ratnarajah et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Zooplankton are major consumers of phytoplankton primary production in marine ecosystems. As such, they represent a critical link for energy and matter transfer between phytoplankton and bacterioplankton to higher trophic levels and play an important role in global biogeochemical cycles. In this Review, we discuss key responses of zooplankton to ocean warming, including shifts in phenology, range, and body size, and assess the implications to the biological carbon pump and interactions with higher trophic levels. Our synthesis highlights key knowledge gaps and geographic gaps in monitoring coverage that need to be urgently addressed. We also discuss an integrated sampling approach that combines traditional and novel techniques to improve zooplankton observation for the benefit of monitoring zooplankton populations and modelling future scenarios under global changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Predicted changes in sea surface temperature (SST) and net primary productivity (NPP) for the global ocean.
Multi-model mean projections for SST and NPP from 10 CMIP6 Earth system models for the historical period (1995–2014), future (2081–2100) and the change in SST and NPP by 2081–2100 relative to 1995–2014 based on SSP5–8.5. Publicly available datasets were analysed in this review. The 10 CMIP6 Earth system models used were ACCESS-ESM1.5, CESM2, CESM2-WACCM, CNRM-ESM2-1, GFDL-ESM4, IPSL-CM6A-LR, MIROS-ES2L, MPI-ESM1.2HR, NorESM2-LM and UKESM1-0-LL. This data can be found at: https://esgf.llnl.gov/.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. The role of zooplankton within the biological carbon pump and possible climate-driven impacts on key zooplankton processes.
a Zooplankton graze on phytoplankton, transferring carbon and nutrients. Excess nutrients in zooplankton are recycled via excretion and egestion either within the upper ocean or throughout the entire water column as some zooplankton undertake diel vertical migration. Unconsumed phytoplankton form aggregates, and together with zooplankton faecal pellets, these particles rapidly sink and are exported to deeper waters. However, bacteria remineralise much of these sinking particles along its descent. b The smaller figure showcases the potential direction of change on three zooplankton processes – respiration, grazing, and excretion and egestion, under ocean warming. Studies to date show that zooplankton respiration will increase under a future warmer ocean, however the magnitude of grazing and excretion and egestion are unclear. Consequently, the magnitude of carbon exported through zooplankton-related activities under ocean warming remains unclear. This figure was designed by Dr Stacey McCormack (Visual Knowledge).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Map of long-term monitoring programmes for zooplankton in the global ocean.
Blue lines indicate Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR) surveys and symbols indicate sites of specific long-term monitoring programmes (see Supplementary Data 1 for details of numbered sites). Stars indicate data is freely available to download, squares indicate data available on request, triangle indicates partially available, and circles indicate data either not available or unclear on data availability. Only programmes where coordinates were available were plotted. Data sourced from the Marine Ecological Time Series Database, EuroSea survey and surveys undertaken as part of this review effort. More information and coordinates are provided in the Supplementary information. This figure was designed by Dr Stacey McCormack (Visual Knowledge).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Integrating traditional zooplankton in situ sampling methods and modern sampling techniques.
Traditional techniques such as Continuous Plankton Recorder (CPR), nets and Niskin bottles have been used to monitor zooplankton for decades with great success. However, coupling traditional techniques with newer methods such as molecular data (for example, DNA, RNA and proteins), advanced sensors, in situ imaging approaches and satellites can improve geographic coverage, particularly in under sampled regions and improve our understanding of the impact of climate change on zooplankton communities. Whilst the CPR, nets and Niskin bottles are shown together, they are not generally conducted simultaneously. This figure was designed by Dr Stacey McCormack (Visual Knowledge).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pitois SG, Lynam CP, Jansen T, Halliday N, Edwards M. Bottom-up effects of climate on fish populations: data from the Continuous Plankton Recorder. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012;456:169–186.
    1. Ruzicka JJ, et al. Interannual variability in the Northern California Current food web structure: changes in energy flow pathways and the role of forage fish, euphausiids, and jellyfish. Prog. Oceanogr. 2012;102:19–41.
    1. Lauria V, Attrill MJ, Brown A, Edwards M, Votier SC. Regional variation in the impact of climate change: evidence that bottom-up regulation from plankton to seabirds is weak in parts of the Northeast Atlantic. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013;488:11–22.
    1. Heneghan, R. F., Everett, J. D., Blanchard, J. L. & Richardson, A. J. Zooplankton are not fish: improving zooplankton realism in size-spectrum models mediates energy transfer in food webs. Front. Mar. Sci.10.3389/fmars.2016.00201 (2016).
    1. Lehette P, Tovar-Sánchez A, Duarte CM, Hernández-León S. Krill excretion and its effect on primary production. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2012;459:29–38.

Publication types