Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 20;13(11):5962-5970.
doi: 10.1364/BOE.474273. eCollection 2022 Nov 1.

Optical biosensor based on SERS with signal calibration function for quantitative detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

Affiliations

Optical biosensor based on SERS with signal calibration function for quantitative detection of carcinoembryonic antigen

Tingyin Wang et al. Biomed Opt Express. .

Abstract

Monitoring the levels of cancer biomarkers is essential for cancer diagnosis and evaluation. In this study, a novel sandwich type sensing platform based on surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) technology was developed for the detection of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.258 ng/mL. In order to achieve sensitive detection of CEA in complex samples, gold nanoparticle monolayer modified with CEA antibodies and with aptamer-functionalized probes was fabricated to target CEA. Two gold layers were integrated into the SERS platform, which greatly enhanced the signal of the probe by generating tremendous "hot spots". Meanwhile, the intensity ratio of Raman probes and the second-order peak of the silicon wafer was used to achieve dynamic calibration of the Raman probe signal. Excitingly, this sensing platform was capable of distinguishing cancer patients from healthy individuals via CEA concentrations in blood samples with the accuracy of 100%. This sandwich structure SERS sensing platform presented promising potential to be an alternative tool for clinical biomarker detection in the field of cancer diagnosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest related to this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Assembly schematic of SERS sensing platform based on sandwich structure: fabrication process of aptamer-functionalized SERS probes and immune-modified nanoparticle monolayers and specific capture of target CEA.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Size distribution (a), UV-vis spectra (b) and zeta potentials (c) obtained for Au NPs (I), Au@4MBA&Apt@BSA NPs (II) and Au@4MBA&Apt@BSA@CEA NPs (III). (d) SERS spectra of SERS sensor platform assembly process. (e)TEM image of Au NPs. (f) SEM image of self-assembled two-dimensional substrate, insert: SERS mapping for two-dimensional substrate.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
(a) Raman spectra with different concentrations of CEA from 1 ng/mL−10µg/mL obtained on CEA SERS sensing planform. (b) The enlarged portion at the dotted line in (a). (c) CEA detection logarithmic concentration curves generated by ratio of the peaks at 940 cm−1and 1583 cm−1 (I1583/I940). (d)Average Raman spectra of different concentrations of CEA without intensity correction. (e)CEA detection logarithmic concentration curves generated by plotting the average intensity at 1583 cm−1. (f)Selectivity of the detection of CEA (1 ng/mL), with the blank control and the interfering substances of BSA and AFP presented at the same concentration.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
(a) Comparison of the mean SERS spectra for the normal serum versus that of the breast cancer with 940 cm−1 intensity correction. (b) SERS intensity ratio (I1583cm−1/I940cm−1) in 20 serum samples obtained on CEA SERS sensing planform. (c) Distribution of spectral peak intensities at I1583cm−1/I940cm−1 in healthy humans(n = 10) and breast cancer patients (n = 10). (d) Distribution of spectral peak intensities at 1583cm−1 in healthy humans(n = 10) and breast cancer patients (n = 10). *P value < 0.05. **P value < 0.01. ***P value < 0.001.

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . World Cancer Report 2020 (2020).
    1. Bray F., Ferlay J., Soerjomataram I., Siegel R. L., Torre L. A., Jemal A., “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” Ca-Cancer J. Clin. 71, 209–249 (2021). 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Torre L. A., Islami F., Siegel R. L., Ward E. M., Jemal A., “Global cancer in women: burden and trend,” Cancer Epidemiol., Biomarkers Prev. 26(4), 444–457 (2017). 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0858 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee A. W. M., Ma B. B. Y., Ng W. T., Chan A. T. C., “Management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: current practice and future perspective,” JCO 33(29), 3356–3364 (2015). 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.9347 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Askhar L. K., Zaki Y. H., “Female patients’ perception of pain caused by mammography in the western region of Saudi Arabia,” SMJ 38(7), 768–771 (2017). 10.15537/smj.2017.7.19298 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources