Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar;54(3):831-839.
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041098. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

Rehabilitation Therapy Doses Are Low After Stroke and Predicted by Clinical Factors

Collaborators, Affiliations

Rehabilitation Therapy Doses Are Low After Stroke and Predicted by Clinical Factors

Brittany M Young et al. Stroke. 2023 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Stroke is a leading cause of long-term disability. Greater rehabilitation therapy after stroke is known to improve functional outcomes. This study examined therapy doses during the first year of stroke recovery and identified factors that predict rehabilitation therapy dose.

Methods: Adults with new radiologically confirmed stroke were enrolled 2 to 10 days after stroke onset at 28 acute care hospitals across the United States. Following an initial assessment during acute hospitalization, the number of physical therapy, occupational therapy, and speech therapy sessions were determined at visits occurring 3, 6, and 12 months following stroke. Negative binomial regression examined whether clinical and demographic factors were associated with therapy counts. False discovery rate was used to correct for multiple comparisons.

Results: Of 763 patients enrolled during acute stroke admission, 510 were available for follow-up. Therapy counts were low overall, with most therapy delivered within the first 3 months; 35.0% of patients received no physical therapy; 48.8%, no occupational therapy, and 61.7%, no speech therapy. Discharge destination was significantly related to cumulative therapy; the percentage of patients discharged to an inpatient rehabilitation facility varied across sites, from 0% to 71%. Most demographic factors did not predict therapy dose, although Hispanic patients received a lower cumulative amount of physical therapy and occupational therapy. Acutely, the severity of clinical factors (grip strength and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score, as well as National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale subscores for aphasia and neglect) predicted higher subsequent therapy doses. Measures of impairment and function (Fugl-Meyer, modified Rankin Scale, and Stroke Impact Scale Activities of Daily Living) assessed 3 months after stroke also predicted subsequent cumulative therapy doses.

Conclusions: Rehabilitative therapy doses during the first year poststroke are low in the United States. This is the first US-wide study to demonstrate that behavioral deficits predict therapy dose, with patients having more severe deficits receiving higher doses. Findings suggest directions for identifying groups at risk of receiving disproportionately low rehabilitation doses.

Keywords: United States; aphasia; demography; rehabilitation; stroke.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Discharge Destination From Acute Stroke Admission According to Enrollment Site. Sites are numbered in order of number of enrollees, which is reflected in column width. IRF=Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility, SNF=Skilled Nursing Facility, ACH=Acute Care Hospital.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Cumulative Rehabilitative Therapy from 3-Months to One Year Post-Stroke in Relation to 3-month mRS Score Higher mRS (modified Rankin Scale) score, indicating greater disability, at 3-months post-stroke was associated with a larger dose of subsequent rehabilitation therapy. A. Physical therapy, B. Occupational therapy, and C. Speech therapy.

References

    1. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191–196. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(98)09477-x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Galvin R, Cusack T, O’Grady E, Murphy TB, Stokes E. Family-mediated exercise intervention (FAME): evaluation of a novel form of exercise delivery after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:681–686. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.110.594689 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004;35:2529–2539. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45:2053–2058. doi: 10.1161/strokeaha.114.004695 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types