Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2023 Mar 30;25(3):914-921.
doi: 10.1093/europace/euac270.

Real-world clinical outcomes with a next-generation left atrial appendage closure device: the FLXibility Post-Approval Study

Affiliations
Comment

Real-world clinical outcomes with a next-generation left atrial appendage closure device: the FLXibility Post-Approval Study

Tim R Betts et al. Europace. .

Abstract

Aims: The FLXibility Post-Approval Study collected data on unselected patients implanted with a WATCHMAN FLX in a commercial clinical setting.

Methods and results: Patients were implanted with a WATCHMAN FLX per local standard of care, with a subsequent first follow-up visit from 45 to 120 days post-implant and a final follow-up at 1-year post-procedure. A Clinical Event Committee adjudicated all major adverse events and TEE/CT imaging results were adjudicated by a core laboratory. Among 300 patients enrolled at 17 centres in Europe, the mean age was 74.6 ± 8.0 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.6, and 62.1% were male. The device was successfully implanted in 99.0% (297/300) of patients. The post-implant medication regimen was DAPT for 87.3% (262/300). At first follow-up, core-lab adjudicated complete seal was 88.2% (149/169), 9.5% (16/169) had leak <3 mm, 2.4 (4/169) had leak ≥3 mm to ≤5 mm, and 0% had >5 mm leak. At 1 year, 93.3% (280/300) had final follow-up; 60.5% of patients were on a single antiplatelet medication, 21.4% were on DAPT, 5.6% were on direct oral anticoagulation, and 12.1% were not taking any antiplatelet/anticoagulation medication. Adverse event rates through 1 year were: all-cause death 10.8% (32/295); CV/unexplained death 5.1% (15/295); disabling and non-disabling stroke each 1.0% (3/295, all non-fatal); pericardial effusion requiring surgery or pericardiocentesis 1.0% (3/295); and device-related thrombus 2.4% (7/295).

Conclusion: The WATCHMAN FLX device had excellent procedural success rates, high LAA seal rates, and low rates of thromboembolic events in everyday clinical practice.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Left atrial appendage closure; Left atrial appendage obstruction; Stroke prevention (limit 6); WATCHMAN FLX.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest. T.R.B.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Boston Scientific). M.G.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific), research grants (Boston Scientific). J.E.N.K.: procotoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific), research grants (Abbott, Boston Scientific). T.S.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Boston Scientific). M.S.: nothing to disclose. G.C.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Lifetech). M.B.: Speaker honoraria and study support (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Daiichi, Medtronic, MSD/Pfizer). D.H.-S.: proctoring/advisory board honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Eclipse Medical). T.C.: salary and equity (Boston Scientific Corporation). D.J.A.: salary and equity (Boston Scientific Corporation).

Figures

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient disposition. Patient flow throughout the study. One enrolled patient did not meet the eligibility criteria and did not undergo an attempted implant; thus, the Attempt/Implant population consisted of 300 patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Left atrial appendage seal at first follow-up visit (45–120 days). Results are core-lab adjudicated assessment by transoesphageal echocardiography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Antiplatelet/anticoagulation medications at hospital discharge and 1 year. DAPT, dual antiplatelet therapy; DOAC, direct oral anticoagulant; SAPT, single antiplatelet therapy; VKA, Vitamin K antagonist.

Comment on

References

    1. Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZGet al. . Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009;374:534–42. - PubMed
    1. Holmes DR, Kar S, Price MJet al. . Prospective randomized evaluation of the watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1–12. - PubMed
    1. Reddy VY, David H, Doshi Shephal K, Petr N, Saibal K. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Circulation 2011; 123:417–24. - PubMed
    1. Reddy VY, Möbius-Winkler S, Miller MAet al. . Left atrial appendage closure with the watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA plavix feasibility study with watchman left atrial appendage closure technology). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2551–6. - PubMed
    1. Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar Set al. . 5-Year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure: from the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2964–75. - PubMed

Substances