Real-world clinical outcomes with a next-generation left atrial appendage closure device: the FLXibility Post-Approval Study
- PMID: 36734247
- PMCID: PMC10062328
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac270
Real-world clinical outcomes with a next-generation left atrial appendage closure device: the FLXibility Post-Approval Study
Abstract
Aims: The FLXibility Post-Approval Study collected data on unselected patients implanted with a WATCHMAN FLX in a commercial clinical setting.
Methods and results: Patients were implanted with a WATCHMAN FLX per local standard of care, with a subsequent first follow-up visit from 45 to 120 days post-implant and a final follow-up at 1-year post-procedure. A Clinical Event Committee adjudicated all major adverse events and TEE/CT imaging results were adjudicated by a core laboratory. Among 300 patients enrolled at 17 centres in Europe, the mean age was 74.6 ± 8.0 years, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 4.3 ± 1.6, and 62.1% were male. The device was successfully implanted in 99.0% (297/300) of patients. The post-implant medication regimen was DAPT for 87.3% (262/300). At first follow-up, core-lab adjudicated complete seal was 88.2% (149/169), 9.5% (16/169) had leak <3 mm, 2.4 (4/169) had leak ≥3 mm to ≤5 mm, and 0% had >5 mm leak. At 1 year, 93.3% (280/300) had final follow-up; 60.5% of patients were on a single antiplatelet medication, 21.4% were on DAPT, 5.6% were on direct oral anticoagulation, and 12.1% were not taking any antiplatelet/anticoagulation medication. Adverse event rates through 1 year were: all-cause death 10.8% (32/295); CV/unexplained death 5.1% (15/295); disabling and non-disabling stroke each 1.0% (3/295, all non-fatal); pericardial effusion requiring surgery or pericardiocentesis 1.0% (3/295); and device-related thrombus 2.4% (7/295).
Conclusion: The WATCHMAN FLX device had excellent procedural success rates, high LAA seal rates, and low rates of thromboembolic events in everyday clinical practice.
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Left atrial appendage closure; Left atrial appendage obstruction; Stroke prevention (limit 6); WATCHMAN FLX.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest. T.R.B.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Boston Scientific). M.G.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific), research grants (Boston Scientific). J.E.N.K.: procotoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific), research grants (Abbott, Boston Scientific). T.S.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Boston Scientific). M.S.: nothing to disclose. G.C.: proctoring/consultancy honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Lifetech). M.B.: Speaker honoraria and study support (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Daiichi, Medtronic, MSD/Pfizer). D.H.-S.: proctoring/advisory board honoraria (Abbott, Boston Scientific, Eclipse Medical). T.C.: salary and equity (Boston Scientific Corporation). D.J.A.: salary and equity (Boston Scientific Corporation).
Figures




Comment on
-
Primary Outcome Evaluation of a Next-Generation Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device: Results From the PINNACLE FLX Trial.Circulation. 2021 May 4;143(18):1754-1762. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.050117. Epub 2021 Apr 6. Circulation. 2021. PMID: 33820423
References
-
- Holmes DR, Reddy VY, Turi ZGet al. . Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage versus warfarin therapy for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2009;374:534–42. - PubMed
-
- Holmes DR, Kar S, Price MJet al. . Prospective randomized evaluation of the watchman left atrial appendage closure device in patients with atrial fibrillation versus long-term warfarin therapy: the PREVAIL trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:1–12. - PubMed
-
- Reddy VY, David H, Doshi Shephal K, Petr N, Saibal K. Safety of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Circulation 2011; 123:417–24. - PubMed
-
- Reddy VY, Möbius-Winkler S, Miller MAet al. . Left atrial appendage closure with the watchman device in patients with a contraindication for oral anticoagulation: the ASAP study (ASA plavix feasibility study with watchman left atrial appendage closure technology). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:2551–6. - PubMed
-
- Reddy VY, Doshi SK, Kar Set al. . 5-Year outcomes after left atrial appendage closure: from the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;70:2964–75. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous