Communication in the context of glioblastoma treatment: A qualitative study of what matters most to patients, caregivers and health care professionals
- PMID: 36734532
- PMCID: PMC10227096
- DOI: 10.1177/02692163231152525
Communication in the context of glioblastoma treatment: A qualitative study of what matters most to patients, caregivers and health care professionals
Abstract
Background: Patients with glioblastoma have a poor prognosis and treatment is palliative in nature from diagnosis. It is therefore critical that the benefits and burdens of treatments are clearly discussed with patients and caregivers.
Aim: To explore experiences and preferences around glioblastoma treatment communication in patients, family caregivers and healthcare professionals.
Design: Qualitative design. A thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews.
Setting/participants: A total of 15 adult patients with glioblastoma, 13 caregivers and 5 healthcare professionals were recruited from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust.
Results: Four themes were identified: (1) Communication practice and preferences. Risks and side-effects of anti-tumour treatments were explained clearly, with information layered and repeated. Treatment was often understood to be 'the only option'. Understanding the impact of side-effects could be enhanced, alongside information about support services. (2) What matters most. Patients/caregivers valued being well-supported by a trusted treatment team, feeling involved, having control and quality of life. Healthcare professionals similarly highlighted trust, maintaining independence and emotional support as key. (3) Decision-making. With limited treatment options, trust and control are crucial in decision-making. Patients ultimately prefer to follow healthcare professional advice but want to be involved, consider alternatives and voice what matters to them. (4) Impact of COVID-19. During the pandemic, greater efforts to maintain good communication were necessary. Negative impacts of COVID-19 were limited, caregivers appeared most disadvantaged by pandemic-related restrictions.
Conclusions: In glioblastoma treatment communication, where prognosis is poor and treatmentwill not result in cure, building trusting relationships, maintaining a sense of control and being well-informed are identified as critical.
Keywords: Brain tumour; caregivers; communication; decision-making; glioblastoma; palliative care.
Conflict of interest statement
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
References
-
- Brodbelt A, Greenberg D, Winters T, et al.. Glioblastoma in England: 2007–2011. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51: 533–542. - PubMed
-
- Stupp R, Mason WP, Van den Bent MJ, et al.. Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 987–996. - PubMed
-
- Nguyen MH, Smets EM, Bol N, et al.. Fear and forget: how anxiety impacts information recall in newly diagnosed cancer patients visiting a fast-track clinic. Acta Oncol 2019; 58: 182–188. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
