Optimizing machine learning algorithms for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility with four training scenarios
- PMID: 36735134
- DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-25090-2
Optimizing machine learning algorithms for spatial prediction of gully erosion susceptibility with four training scenarios
Abstract
Gully erosion causes high soil erosion rates and is an environmental concern posing major risk to the sustainability of cultivated areas of the world. Gullies modify the land, shape new landforms, and damage agricultural fields. Gully erosion mapping is essential to understand the mechanism, development, and evolution of gullies. In this work, a new modeling approach was employed for gully erosion susceptibility mapping (GESM) in the Golestan Dam basin of Iran. The measurements of 14 gully erosion (GE) factors at 1042 GE locations were compiled in a spatial database. Four training datasets comprised of 100%, 75%, 50%, and 25% of the entire database were used for modeling and validation (for each data set in the common 70:30 ratio). Four machine learning models-maximum entropy (MaxEnt), general linear model (GLM), support vector machine (SVM), and artificial neural network (ANN)- were employed to check the usefulness of the four training scenarios. The results of random forest (RF) analysis indicated that the most important GE effective factors were distance from the stream, elevation, distance from the road, and vertical distance of the channel network (VDCN). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to validate the results. Our study showed that the sample size influenced the performance of the four machine learning algorithms. However, the ANN had a lower sensitivity to the reduction of sample size. In addition, validation results revealed that ANN (AUROC = 0.85.7-0.90.4%) had the best performance based on all four sample data sets. The results of this research can be useful and valuable guidelines for choosing machine learning methods when a complete gully inventory is not available in a region.
Keywords: GIS; Gully erosion; Iran; Machine learning.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Abraham A (2005) Artificial neural networks. Handbook of measuring system design. John Wiley & Sons, London, pp 901–908
-
- Achour Y, Pourghasemi HR (2019) How do machine learning techniques help in increasing accuracy of landslide susceptibility maps? Geosci Front 11:871–883
-
- Al-Abadi AM, Al-Ali AK (2018) Susceptibility mapping of gully erosion using GIS-based statistical bivariate models: a case study from Ali Al-Gharbi District, Maysan Governorate, southern Iraq. Environ Earth Sci 77:249
-
- Alizadeh M, Ngah I, Hashim M, Pradhan B, Pour AB (2018) A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (ANP-ANN) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment. Remote Sens 10:975
-
- Amare S, Keesstra S, van der Ploeg M, Langendoen E, Steenhuis T, Tilahun S (2019) Causes and controlling factors of Valley bottom Gullies. Land 8(9):141
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
