Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May;11(3):677-683.
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00646-5. Epub 2023 Feb 3.

Discrepancy between DXA and CT-based assessment of spine bone mineral density

Samuel Davidson  1 , Alison Vecellio  2 , Ilexa Flagstad  2 , Kenneth Holton  2 , Angela Bruzina  2 , Paul Lender  2 , Susanne Trost  3 , David Polly Jr  2   4
Affiliations

Discrepancy between DXA and CT-based assessment of spine bone mineral density

Samuel Davidson et al. Spine Deform. 2023 May.

Abstract

Purpose: Adequate bone mineral density (BMD) is necessary for success in spine surgery. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the gold standard in determining BMD but may give spuriously high values. Hounsfield units (HU) from computed tomography (CT) may provide a more accurate depiction of the focal BMD encountered during spine surgery. Our objective is to determine the discrepancy rate between DXA and CT BMD determinations and how often DXA overestimates BMD compared to CT.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 93 patients with both DXA and CT within 6 months. DXA lumbar spine and overall T scores were classified as osteoporotic (T Score ≤ - 2.5) or non-osteoporotic (T Score > -2.5). L1 vertebral body HU were classified as osteoporotic or non-osteoporotic using cutoff thresholds of either ≤ 135 HU or ≤ 110 HU. Corresponding DXA and HU classifications were compared to determine disagreement and overestimation rates.

Results: Using lumbar T scores, the CT vs DXA disagreement rate was 40-54% depending on the HU threshold. DXA overestimated BMD 97-100% of the time compared to CT. Using overall DXA T scores, the disagreement rate was 33-47% with DXA greater than CT 74-87% of the time. In the sub-cohort of 10 patients with very low HU (HU < 80), DXA overestimated BMD compared to CT in every instance.

Conclusions: There is a large discrepancy between DXA and CT BMD determinations. DXA frequently overestimates regional BMD encountered during spine surgery compared with CT. While DXA remains the gold standard in determining BMD, CT may play an important role in defining the focal BMD pertinent to spine surgery.

Keywords: Bone mineral density (BMD); Computed tomography (CT); Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Holroyd C, Cooper C, Dennison E (2008) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 22(5):671–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2008.06.001 . (PMID: 19028351) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clynes MA, Harvey NC, Curtis EM, Fuggle NR, Dennison EM, Cooper C (2020) The epidemiology of osteoporosis. Br Med Bull 133(1):105–117. https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/ldaa005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K (2001) Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation aug- menting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J 1(6):402–407 - DOI - PubMed
    1. St Jeor JD, Jackson TJ, Xiong AE, Freedman BA, Sebastian AS, Currier BL, Fogelson JL, Bydon M, Nassr A, Elder BD (2020) Average lumbar hounsfield units predicts osteoporosis-related complications following lumbar spine fusion. Global Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568220975365 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Bjerke BT, Zarrabian M, Aleem IS, Fogelson JL, Currier BL, Freedman BA, Bydon M, Nassr A (2018) Incidence of osteoporosis-related complications following posterior lumbar fusion. Global Spine J 8(6):563–569. https://doi.org/10.1177/2192568217743727 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources