Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 3;18(2):e0281327.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281327. eCollection 2023.

Imaging delays among medical inpatients in Toronto, Ontario: A cohort study

Affiliations

Imaging delays among medical inpatients in Toronto, Ontario: A cohort study

Emily Bartsch et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Imaging procedures are commonly performed on hospitalized patients and waiting for these could increase length-of-stay. The study objective was to quantify delays for imaging procedures in General Internal Medicine and identify contributing patient, physician, and system factors.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of medical inpatients admitted to 5 hospitals in Toronto, Ontario (2010-2019), with at least one imaging procedure (CT, MRI, ultrasound, or peripherally-inserted central catheter [PICC] insertion). The primary outcome was time-to-test, and the secondary outcome was acute length-of-stay after test ordering.

Results: The study cohort included 73,107 hospitalizations. Time-to-test was longest for MRI (median 22 hours) and shortest for CT (median 7 hours). The greatest contributors to time-to-test were system factors such as hospital site (up to 22 additional hours), location of test ordering (up to 10 additional hours), the timing of test ordering relative to admission (up to 13 additional hours), and ordering during weekends (up to 21 additional hours). Older patient age, having more comorbidities, and residence in a low-income neighborhood were also associated with testing delays. Each additional hour spent waiting for a test was associated with increased acute length-of-stay after test ordering, ranging from 0.4 additional hours for CT to 1.2 hours for MRI.

Conclusions: The greatest contributors to testing delays relate to when and where a test was ordered. Wait times affect length-of-stay and the quality of patient care. Hospitals can apply our novel approach to explore opportunities to decrease testing delays locally.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal’s policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: Lauren Lapointe-Shaw is supported by the University of Toronto Department of Medicine, the Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, the Women’s College Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care (WIHV) and the Peter Gilgan Centre for Women’s Cancers at Women’s College Hospital, in partnership with the Canadian Cancer Society. Amol Verma and Fahad Razak are part-time employees of Ontario Health, outside of the submitted work. The development of the GEMINI data platform has been supported with funding from the Canadian Cancer Society, the Canadian Frailty Network, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Canadian Medical Protective Agency, Green Shield Canada Foundation, the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Ontario Health, the St. Michael’s Hospital Association Innovation Fund, the University of Toronto Department of Medicine, and in-kind support from partner hospitals and the Vector Institute. Fahad Razak holds a salary award from the Mak Pak Chiu and Mak-Soo Lai Hing Chair in General Internal Medicine, University of Toronto and the PSI Graham Farquharson Knowledge Translation Fellowship. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Hospital-specific adjusted time-to-test (median, hours, +/- 95% confidence intervals) for imaging procedures for patients admitted to General Internal Medicine.
Note: Hospital B did not contribute information on time to MRI as it uses a paper-based ordering system.

References

    1. Verma AA, Guo Y, Kwan JL, Lapointe-Shaw L, Rawal S, Tang T, et al.. Patient characteristics, resource use and outcomes associated with general internal medicine hospital care: the General Medicine Inpatient Initiative (GEMINI) retrospective cohort study. C open. 2017;5: E842–E849. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20170097 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cournane S, Conway R, Creagh D, Byrne DG, Sheehy N, Silke B. Radiology imaging delays as independent predictors of length of hospital stay for emergency medical admissions. Clin Radiol. 2016;71: 912–918. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.03.023 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Batlle JC, Hahn PF, Thrall JH, Lee SI. Patients imaged early during admission demonstrate reduced length of hospital stay: a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing cross-sectional imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7: 269–276. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2009.11.024 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wardlaw JM, Seymour J, Cairns J, Keir S, Lewis S, Sandercock P. Immediate computed tomography scanning of acute stroke is cost-effective and improves quality of life. Stroke. 2004;35: 2477–2483. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000143453.78005.44 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cournane S, Creagh D, O’Hare N, Sheehy N, Silke B. MRI in acutely ill medical patients in an Irish hospital: influence on outcomes and length of hospital stay. J Am Coll Radiol. 2014;11: 698–702. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.01.014 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources