Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May:121:109962.
doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2023.109962. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Mailing abortion pills does not delay care: A cohort study comparing mailed to in-person dispensing of abortion medications in the United States

Affiliations

Mailing abortion pills does not delay care: A cohort study comparing mailed to in-person dispensing of abortion medications in the United States

Leah R Koenig et al. Contraception. 2023 May.

Abstract

Objective: Given the substantial barriers to abortion access in the United States, many clinics now mail patients abortion medications. We examined whether dispensing the medications by mail prolonged time to medication use.

Study design: We analyzed data from no-test medication abortions with medication provided either by mail or in a clinic from 11 United States clinics from February 2020 to January 2021. We examined mean number of days from patients' first contact with the clinic to mifepristone ingestion, its two-component intervals (first contact to medication dispensing and dispensing to mifepristone ingestion), and pregnancy duration at mifepristone ingestion. We used Poisson regression to compare mean outcomes across three dispensing methods: in-person, mailed from the clinic, and mailed from a mail-order pharmacy.

Results: Among the 2600 records, patients took mifepristone on average at 49 days of gestation (95% CI, 47-51) and 7 days (95% CI, 4-10) after first contact. Mean time from first contact to mifepristone ingestion was 6 days when medications were dispensed in-person and 9 days when mailed (p = 0.38). While time from first contact to dispensing was similar across methods (6 days in-person, 5 days mailed, p = 0.77), more time elapsed from dispensing to mifepristone ingestion when medications were mailed (4 days from clinic, 5 days from mail-order pharmacy) versus dispensed in-person (0.3 days, p < 0.001). Time to mifepristone ingestion was shorter with higher pregnancy duration. Pregnancy duration at ingestion was similar across methods (48 days in-person, 50 days mailed).

Conclusions: Mailing medications did not significantly prolong time from patients' first contact with the clinic to mifepristone ingestion or increase pregnancy duration at mifepristone ingestion.

Implications: Abortion providers should offer a range of medication abortion dispensing options, prioritizing patient preference.

Keywords: Mailing; Medication abortion; Mifepristone; Pharmacy; Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS); Telehealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Mean days from first contact to mifepristone ingestion among medication abortions provided in the US, February 2020–January 2021 (n = 2600).
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Days from first contact to mifepristone ingestion among medication abortions provided by 11 clinics in the USA, by pregnancy duration at first contact with the clinic, February 2020–January 2021 (n = 2600).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Am. Coll. of Obstetricians & Gynecologists v. U.S. Food & Drug Admin. No. 472 F. Supp. 3d 183 (United States District Court of Maryland; 2020).
    1. US Food and Drug Administration. Mifeprex Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) Program. US Food and Drug Administration; 2023.
    1. Upadhyay UD, Koenig LR, Meckstroth KR. Safety and efficacy of telehealth medication abortions in the US during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open 2021;4:e2122320. (Aug 2). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Upadhyay UD, Raymond EG, Koenig LR, Coplon L, Gold M, Kaneshiro B, et al. Outcomes and safety of history-based screening for medication abortion: a retrospective multicenter cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 2022;182:482–91. (May 1). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aiken A, Lohr PA, Lord J, Ghosh N, Starling J. Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study. BJOG 2021;128:1464–74. (Aug). - PMC - PubMed

Publication types