Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 4;23(1):117.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08799-1.

Experiences from the Philippine grassroots: impact of strengthening primary care systems on health worker satisfaction and intention to stay

Regine Ynez H De Mesa  1 , Jose Rafael A Marfori  2 , Noleen Marie C Fabian  3 , Romelei Camiling-Alfonso  2 , Mark Anthony U Javelosa  3 , Nannette Bernal-Sundiang  3 , Leonila F Dans  2 , Ysabela T Calderon  2 , Jayson A Celeste  3 , Josephine T Sanchez  3 , Mia P Rey  3 , Cara Lois T Galingana  3 , Ramon Pedro P Paterno  3 , Jesusa T Catabui  3 , Johanna Faye E Lopez  3 , Maria Rhodora N Aquino  3 , Antonio Miguel L Dans  2
Affiliations

Experiences from the Philippine grassroots: impact of strengthening primary care systems on health worker satisfaction and intention to stay

Regine Ynez H De Mesa et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Inequities in health access and outcomes persist in low- and middle-income countries. While strengthening primary care is integral in improving patient outcomes, primary care networks remain undervalued, underfunded, and underdeveloped in many LMICs such as the Philippines. This paper underscores the value of strengthening primary care system interventions in LMICs by examining their impact on job satisfaction and intention to stay among healthcare workers in the Philippines.

Methods: This study was conducted in urban, rural, and remote settings in the Philippines. A total of 36 urban, 54 rural, and 117 remote healthcare workers participated in the study. Respondents comprised all family physicians, nurses, midwives, community health workers, and staff involved in the delivery of primary care services from the sites. A questionnaire examining job satisfaction (motivators) and dissatisfaction (hygiene) factors was distributed to healthcare workers before and after system interventions were introduced across sites. Interventions included the introduction of performance-based incentives, the adoption of electronic health records, and the enhancement of diagnostic and pharmaceutical capabilities over a 1-year period. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a McNemar's chi-square test were then conducted to compare pre- and post-intervention experiences for each setting.

Results: Among the factors examined, results revealed a significant improvement in perceived compensation fairness among urban (p = 0.001) and rural (p = 0.016) providers. The rural workforce also reported a significant improvement in medicine access (p = 0.012) post-intervention. Job motivation and turnover intention were sustained in urban and rural settings between periods. Despite the interventions introduced, a decline in perceptions towards supply accessibility, job security, and most items classified as job motivators was reported among remote providers. Paralleling this decline, remote primary care providers with the intent to stay dropped from 93% at baseline to 75% at endline (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: The impact of strengthening primary care on health workforce satisfaction and turnover intention varied across urban, rural, and remote settings. While select interventions such as improving compensation were promising for better-supported settings, the immediate impact of these interventions was inadequate in offsetting the infrastructural and staffing gaps experienced in disadvantaged areas. Unless these problems are comprehensively addressed, satisfaction will remain low, workforce attrition will persist as a problem, and marginalized communities will be underserved.

Keywords: Health workforce; Healthcare disparities; Intervention study; Job satisfaction; Primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have no relevant or competing conflicts of interest to declare.

References

    1. Department of Health. Universal health care law [Internet]. Manila: Department of Health; 2016 [cited 2022 Oct 26]. Available from: https://doh.gov.ph/uhc.
    1. Rao M, Pilot E. The missing link–the role of primary care in global health. Glob Health Act. 2014;7(1):23693. doi: 10.3402/gha.v7.23693. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stigler FL, Macinko J, Pettigrew LM, Kumar R, Van Weel C. No universal health coverage without primary health care. Lancet. 2016;387(10030):1811. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30315-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Naria-Maritana MJN, Borlongan GR, Zarsuelo MAM, Buan AKG, Nuestro FKA, dela Rosa JA, Silva MEC, Mendoza MAF, Estacio LR. Addressing primary care inequities in underserved areas of the Philippines: a review. Acta Med Philipp. 2020;54(6). 10.47895/amp.v54i6.2578.
    1. Das J, Hammer J. Quality of primary care in low-income countries: facts and economics. Annu Rev Econ. 2014;6(1):525–553. doi: 10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041350. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources