Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Aug 4;1(3):pgac115.
doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac115. eCollection 2022 Jul.

Reimagine fire science for the anthropocene

Jacquelyn K Shuman  1 Jennifer K Balch  2 Rebecca T Barnes  3 Philip E Higuera  4 Christopher I Roos  5 Dylan W Schwilk  6 E Natasha Stavros  2 Tirtha Banerjee  7 Megan M Bela  8   9 Jacob Bendix  10 Sandro Bertolino  11 Solomon Bililign  12 Kevin D Bladon  13 Paulo Brando  14 Robert E Breidenthal  15 Brian Buma  16 Donna Calhoun  17 Leila M V Carvalho  18 Megan E Cattau  19 Kaelin M Cawley  20 Sudeep Chandra  21 Melissa L Chipman  22 Jeanette Cobian-Iñiguez  23 Erin Conlisk  24 Jonathan D Coop  25 Alison Cullen  26 Kimberley T Davis  4 Archana Dayalu  27 Fernando De Sales  28 Megan Dolman  19 Lisa M Ellsworth  29 Scott Franklin  30 Christopher H Guiterman  8   31 Matthew Hamilton  32 Erin J Hanan  33 Winslow D Hansen  34 Stijn Hantson  35 Brian J Harvey  36 Andrés Holz  37 Tao Huang  19 Matthew D Hurteau  38 Nayani T Ilangakoon  2 Megan Jennings  39 Charles Jones  18 Anna Klimaszewski-Patterson  40 Leda N Kobziar  41 John Kominoski  42 Branko Kosovic  43 Meg A Krawchuk  44 Paul Laris  45 Jackson Leonard  46 S Marcela Loria-Salazar  47 Melissa Lucash  48 Hussam Mahmoud  49 Ellis Margolis  50 Toby Maxwell  51 Jessica L McCarty  52 David B McWethy  53 Rachel S Meyer  54 Jessica R Miesel  55 W Keith Moser  46 R Chelsea Nagy  2 Dev Niyogi  56 Hannah M Palmer  57 Adam Pellegrini  58 Benjamin Poulter  59 Kevin Robertson  60 Adrian V Rocha  61 Mojtaba Sadegh  62 Fernanda Santos  63 Facundo Scordo  64   65 Joseph O Sexton  66 A Surjalal Sharma  67 Alistair M S Smith  68   69 Amber J Soja  70   71 Christopher Still  44 Tyson Swetnam  72 Alexandra D Syphard  73 Morgan W Tingley  74 Ali Tohidi  75 Anna T Trugman  18 Merritt Turetsky  76 J Morgan Varner  60 Yuhang Wang  77 Thea Whitman  78 Stephanie Yelenik  79 Xuan Zhang  57
Affiliations

Reimagine fire science for the anthropocene

Jacquelyn K Shuman et al. PNAS Nexus. .

Abstract

Fire is an integral component of ecosystems globally and a tool that humans have harnessed for millennia. Altered fire regimes are a fundamental cause and consequence of global change, impacting people and the biophysical systems on which they depend. As part of the newly emerging Anthropocene, marked by human-caused climate change and radical changes to ecosystems, fire danger is increasing, and fires are having increasingly devastating impacts on human health, infrastructure, and ecosystem services. Increasing fire danger is a vexing problem that requires deep transdisciplinary, trans-sector, and inclusive partnerships to address. Here, we outline barriers and opportunities in the next generation of fire science and provide guidance for investment in future research. We synthesize insights needed to better address the long-standing challenges of innovation across disciplines to (i) promote coordinated research efforts; (ii) embrace different ways of knowing and knowledge generation; (iii) promote exploration of fundamental science; (iv) capitalize on the "firehose" of data for societal benefit; and (v) integrate human and natural systems into models across multiple scales. Fire science is thus at a critical transitional moment. We need to shift from observation and modeled representations of varying components of climate, people, vegetation, and fire to more integrative and predictive approaches that support pathways toward mitigating and adapting to our increasingly flammable world, including the utilization of fire for human safety and benefit. Only through overcoming institutional silos and accessing knowledge across diverse communities can we effectively undertake research that improves outcomes in our more fiery future.

Keywords: climate change; resilience; social–ecological systems; wildfire; wildland–urban interface.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
We need a proactive fire research agenda to support human values and create safe communities as impacts from lightning and unplanned human-caused wildfires increase in the Anthropocene. Such an agenda will span multiple disciplines and translate understanding to application while answering fundamental science questions, incorporating diverse and inclusive partnerships for knowledge coproduction, capitalizing on the wealth of new and existing data, and developing models that integrate human dimensions and values.

References

    1. McLauchlan KK et al. 2020. Fire as a fundamental ecological process: research advances and frontiers. J Ecol. 108:2047–2069.
    1. Medler MJ. 2011. Speculations about the effects of fire and lava flows on human evolution. Fire Ecol. 7:13–23.
    1. Thompson JC et al. 2021. Early human impacts and ecosystem reorganization in southern-central Africa. Sci Adv. 7:eabf9776. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crutzen PJ. 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature. 415:23–23. - PubMed
    1. Bowman DMJS et al. 2020. Vegetation fires in the Anthropocene. Nat Rev Earth Environ. 1:1–16.. DOI: 10.1038/s43017-020-0085-3. - DOI