Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jun 3;12(1):24-30.
doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1728784. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Performance of Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Children

Affiliations

Performance of Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium Scale in Mechanically Ventilated Children

Neha Gupta et al. J Pediatr Intensive Care. .

Abstract

Accuracy of delirium diagnosis in mechanically ventilated children is often limited by their varying developmental abilities. The purpose of this study was to examine the performance of the Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium (CAPD) scale in these patients. This is a single-center, prospective, observational study of patients requiring sedation and mechanical ventilation for 2 days or more. CAPD scale was implemented in our unit for delirium screening. Each CAPD assessment was accompanied by a physician assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-V) criteria. Sensitivity analysis was performed to determine the best cut-off score in our target population. We also evaluated ways to improve the accuracy of this scale in patients with and without developmental delay. A total of 837 paired assessments were performed. Prevalence of delirium was 19%. Overall, CAPD score ≥ 9 had sensitivity of 81.8% and specificity of 44.8%. Among typically developed patients, the sensitivity and specificity were 76.7 and 65.4%, respectively, whereas specificity was only 16.5% for developmentally delayed patients. The best cut-off value for CAPD was 9 for typically developed children and 17 for those with developmental delay (sensitivity 74.4%, specificity 63.2%). Some CAPD questions do not apply to patients with sensory and neurocognitive deficits; upon excluding those questions, the best cut-off values were 5 for typically developed and 6 for developmentally delayed children. In mechanically ventilated patients with developmental delay, CAPD ≥ 9 led to a high false-positive rate. This emphasizes the need for either a different cut-off score or development of a delirium scale specific to this patient population.

Keywords: delirium; developmental delay; pediatric; sensitivity; specificity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest None declared.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Receiver operating characteristic curves for performance of Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium scale.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Receiver operating characteristic curves for Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium scale's performance after excluding questions 1, 2, 4, and 7.

References

    1. Traube C, Silver G, Kearney J. Cornell Assessment of Pediatric Delirium: a valid, rapid, observational tool for screening delirium in the PICU. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(03):656–663. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith H AB, Boyd J, Fuchs D C. Diagnosing delirium in critically ill children: validity and reliability of the Pediatric Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(01):150–157. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Silver G, Traube C, Gerber L M. Pediatric delirium and associated risk factors: a single-center prospective observational study. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2015;16(04):303–309. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith H A, Gangopadhyay M, Goben C M. The Preschool Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU: valid and reliable delirium monitoring for critically ill infants and children. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(03):592–600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Smith H A, Brink E, Fuchs D C, Ely E W, Pandharipande P P. Pediatric delirium: monitoring and management in the pediatric intensive care unit. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2013;60(03):741–760. - PubMed