Transcanal Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre
- PMID: 36742720
- PMCID: PMC9895356
- DOI: 10.1007/s12070-022-03075-4
Transcanal Endoscopic Tympanoplasty: Our Experience at a Tertiary Care Centre
Abstract
Transcanal Myringoplasty can be performed with both microscope and endoscopes. Advancement in endoscopes has started the new era of minimal invasive surgery in otology practice. Endoscopic approach offers improved visualization with wider field of view, easy access to the hidden recesses of the middle ear, avoidance of a postauricular incision and less bony drilling. To report our experience with transcanal endoscopic tympanoplasty for tubotympanic type of COM and to evaluate its outcome in terms of morphological and functional success. Prospective study, conducted during September 2017 to August 2019, including 60 patients of tubotympanic type of COM. All patients underwent transcanal endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty. Postoperative results i.e. graft uptake (morphological success) and hearing improvement (functional success) were evaluated at 6 months. The graft take up rate was 93.33%. Preoperatively mean AB gap was 23.15 ± 7.23 dB which was reduced to 11.68 ± 4.65 dB at 6 month postoperative follow up. The mean gain in AC threshold and AB gap was 15.43 ± 4.37 dB and 11.46 ± 1.13 dB respectively. Improvement in both AC threshold and AB gap was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). No major surgical or thermal injury related complications were observed. Although both microscopic and endoscopic techniques have their advantages and disadvantages, endoscopic technique can effectively replace traditional microscopic techniques in management of COM with satisfactory outcomes. We infer that EES offers less operative time, less postoperative pain, least complications and less hospital stay thus helping to reduce the physical and psychological burden placed on patients.
Keywords: Endoscopic; Functional success; Morphological success; Transcanal; Tympanoplasty.
© Association of Otolaryngologists of India 2022.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Endoscopic Transcanal Myringoplasty for Anterior Perforations of the Tympanic Membrane.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Nov 1;142(11):1088-1093. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2016.2114. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 27540858
-
Transcanal Endoscopic Tympanoplasty for Pediatric Patients Under 15 Years of Age With Chronic Otitis Media.Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020 Feb;13(1):41-46. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2019.00318. Epub 2019 Aug 3. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2020. PMID: 31370387 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative Study Between Post Aural Microscopic and Transcanal Endoscopic Tympanoplasty.Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4036-4045. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02771-x. Epub 2021 Aug 13. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 36742558 Free PMC article.
-
Learning curve comparable study of microscopic and endoscopic type 1 tympanoplasty.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2741-2748. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07777-x. Epub 2022 Dec 13. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 36512107 Review.
-
Endoscopic ear surgery.J Otol. 2020 Mar;15(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.joto.2019.11.004. Epub 2019 Dec 2. J Otol. 2020. PMID: 32110237 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Outcomes of Microscopic vs. Endoscopic Tympanoplasty at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution in Western Maharashtra.Cureus. 2024 Oct 4;16(10):e70833. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70833. eCollection 2024 Oct. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39493106 Free PMC article.
References
-
- McKennan KX. Endoscopic ‘second look’ mastoidoscopy to rule out residual epitympanic/mastoid cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(7):810814. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous