Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):4212-4217.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02915-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.

Testing A Hypothesis: Tinnitus Control by Enhancing Physiological Inhibition

Affiliations

Testing A Hypothesis: Tinnitus Control by Enhancing Physiological Inhibition

Maryam Emadi et al. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Deficit in cognitive functions and central executive function is one of the popular hypotheses on the underlying cause of tinnitus. Some studies expressed the effect of tinnitus on the inhibitory cognitive tasks, referring to the slower inhibitory results such as in the Stroop task in the people suffering from tinnitus as compared to normal subjects. Since Stroop engages the network overlapping the attention and tinnitus distress networks, it seems likely that Stroop exercises can effectively contribute to controlling the tinnitus and its consequent distress through improvement of the cognitive function and increasing the physiological inhibition.

Method: A total of 25 patients with chronic tinnitus (> 6 months) were randomly divided into two groups: an intervention group of 15 patients and a control group of 10 patients. Both groups were subjected to initial evaluations including pure tone audiometry, psychoacoustic measurements, tinnitus handicap inventory (THI) survey, and visual analogue scale (VAS) of annoyance and loudness. The intervention group underwent a rehabilitation program consisting of 6 Stroop training sessions. The control group didn't receive any training. Afterwards, both groups were reevaluated and the results were compared to those of initial evaluations.

Results: Results of this study indicated significant differences in THI scores and VAS of annoyance, before and after Stroop training in the intervention group, although no significant difference was observed when it came to VAS of loudness.

Conclusion: Successive sessions of conflict processing training can improve the annoyance of tinnitus by enhancing the patient's inhibition control, making this task a safe practice for tinnitus treatment.

Keywords: Conflict processing; Inhibition control; Stroop; Tinnitus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflicting interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison the difference of VAS of loudness and annoyance pre and post training of the intervention group **significant *nonsignificant VAS.L: VAS of loudness VAS.A: VAS of annoyance

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Jacquemin L, et al. Effects of electrical stimulation in tinnitus patients: conventional versus high-definition tDCS. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2018;32(8):714–723. doi: 10.1177/1545968318787916. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rhee J, et al. Prevalence, associated factors, and comorbidities of tinnitus in adolescents. PloS one. 2020;15(7):e0236723. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236723. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McFerran DJ, et al. Why is there no cure for tinnitus? Front Neurosci. 2019;13:802. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2019.00802. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sedley W, et al. An integrative tinnitus model based on sensory precision. Trends Neurosci. 2016;39(12):799–812. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2016.10.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shekhawat GS, S.J.S.r. Vanneste, Optimization of transcranial direct current stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for tinnitus: a non-linear dose-response effect. Sci Report. 2018;8(1):8311. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26665-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources