Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Dec;74(Suppl 3):5954-5958.
doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02603-y. Epub 2021 May 11.

Mapping the Risk Factors of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Salvage Laryngectomies

Affiliations

Mapping the Risk Factors of Pharyngocutaneous Fistula After Salvage Laryngectomies

Ahmed Amin Nassar. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

To evaluate the postoperative surgical wound infection prevalence rates of patients undergoing SL, identify the causative organism and determine predisposing factors leading to infection. A retrospective study of all consecutive patients who underwent salvage total laryngectomy at our unit between 2015 and 2020 was performed. The following parameters were also analyzed: age, smoking history, pre and postoperative albumin level, history of radio and chemo-radiotherapy, reconstruction with pectoralis flap, intraoperative tracheoesophageal puncture, and tumor stage. A total of 12 of the 21 patients (57%) experienced a postoperative infection after SL during the study period. 82% of those patients whose preoperative albumin level below 3gm/dl developed postoperative infection. There is a significant increase (p < 0.01) in infection in patients with N1 and 2 stage tumor (68%) compared with the N0 stage tumors (40%). Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative albumin and nodal stage were significant risk factors for postoperative infection.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-021-02603-y.

Keywords: Infections; Laryngectomy; Prophylaxis; Salvage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors do not have any conflict of interest to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Bacteriology data regarding infectious organisms in PCF (n = 12)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Murdoch DA, Telfer MR, Irvine GH. Audit of antibiotic policy and wound infection in neck surgery. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1993;38:167–1692. - PubMed
    1. Tabet JC, Johnson JT. Wound-infection in head and neck-surgery—prophylaxis, etiology and management. J Otolaryngol. 1990;19:197–2003. - PubMed
    1. Scher KS, Bernstein JM, Arenstein GL, Sorensen C. Reducing the cost of surgical prophylaxis. Am Surg. 1990;56:32–35. - PubMed
    1. Ifeacho SN, Bajaj Y, Jephson CG, Albert DM. Surgical siteinfections in paediatric otolaryngology operative procedures. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;76:1020–1022. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2012.03.023. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lotfi CJ, Cavalcanti Rde C, Costa e Silva AM, et al. Risk fac-tors for surgical-site infections in head and neck cancer surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;138:74–80. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2007.09.018. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources