Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;47(2):e13243.
doi: 10.1111/cogs.13243.

Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms

Angelo Pirrone  1 , Konstantinos Tsetsos  2   3
Affiliations

Toward an Atlas of Canonical Cognitive Mechanisms

Angelo Pirrone et al. Cogn Sci. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

A central goal in Cognitive Science is understanding the mechanisms that underlie cognition. Here, we contend that Cognitive Science, despite intense multidisciplinary efforts, has furnished surprisingly few mechanistic insights. We attribute this slow mechanistic progress to the fact that cognitive scientists insist on performing underdetermined exercises, deriving overparametrized mechanistic theories of complex behaviors and seeking validation of these theories to the elusive notions of optimality and biological plausibility. We propose that mechanistic progress in Cognitive Science will accelerate once cognitive scientists start focusing on simpler explananda that will enable them to chart an atlas of elementary cognitive operations. Looking forward, the next challenge for Cognitive Science will be to understand how these elementary cognitive processes are pieced together to explain complex behavior.

Keywords: Biological plausibility; Cognitive science; Inference; Mechanisms; Optimality.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson, J. R. (2013). The adaptive character of thought. Psychology Press.
    1. Bowers, J. S., Malhotra, G., Dujmović, M., Montero, M. L., Tsvetkov, C., Biscione, V., Puebla, G., Adolfi, F. G., Hummel, J., Heaton, R. F., Evans, B., Mitchell, J., & Blything, R. (2022). Deep problems with neural network models of human vision. PsyArXiv, https://psyarxiv.com/5zf4s/
    1. Brunton, B. W., Botvinick, M. M., & Brody, C. D. (2013). Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making. Science, 340(6128), 95-98.
    1. Busemeyer, J. R., Gluth, S., Rieskamp, J., & Turner, B. M. (2019). Cognitive and neural bases of multi-attribute, multi-alternative, value-based decisions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(3), 251-263.
    1. Cisek, P., Puskas, G. A., & El-Murr, S. (2009). Decisions in changing conditions: The urgency-gating model. Journal of Neurosciences, 29(37), 11560-11571.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources