Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 1;277(2):329-334.
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005191. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

Reporting on Race and Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: The Neglect of Racism as a Driver of Inequitable Care

Andrew P Loehrer  1   2 , Priscila C Cevallos  2 , Rafael T Jiménez  2 , Sandra L Wong  1   2
Affiliations

Reporting on Race and Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer: The Neglect of Racism as a Driver of Inequitable Care

Andrew P Loehrer et al. Ann Surg. .

Abstract

Objective: This study reviews the surgical literature on racial disparities in breast cancer mortality, specifically evaluating the inclusion, justification, and discussion of race and ethnicity as a driver of disparities.

Summary of background data: The volume of research on racial disparities has increased over the past 2 decades, but we hypothesize that there is considerable variation in how race is contextualized, defined, and captured in the disparities literature, leading to its questionable validity and relevance as a covariate. Recent guidelines for reporting have been suggested, but not yet applied.

Methods: A rubric was developed to evaluate the reporting of race and/or ethnicity. A systematic review (2010-2020) was performed to identify studies reporting on racial disparities in breast cancer surgery and mortality. We then evaluated these original articles based on key domains of race and/or ethnicity: justification for inclusion, formal definition, methodology used for classification, and type of racism contributing to disparity.

Results: Of the 52 studies assessed, none provided a formal definition for race and/or ethnicity. A justification for the inclusion of race and/or ethnicity was provided in 71% of the studies. Although 81% of studies discussed at least 1 potential driver of observed racial disparities, only 1 study explicitly named racism as a driver of racial disparities.

Conclusions: Significant improvement in the reporting on racial disparities in breast cancer surgical literature is warranted. A more rigorous framework should be applied by both researchers and publishers in reporting on race, racial health disparities, and racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Rivara FP, Finberg L. Use of the terms race and ethnicity. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:119–1119.
    1. Bhopal R, Donaldson L. White, European, Western, Caucasian, or what? Inappropriate labeling in research on race, ethnicity, and health. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1303–1307.
    1. Fullilove MT. Comments and topics for our times comment: abandoning“ race ” as a variable in public health research- an idea whose time has come. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1297–1298.
    1. Cooper RS, Nadkarni GN, Ogedegbe G. Race, ancestry, and reporting in medical journals. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2018;320:1531–1532.
    1. Lee SJC, Grobe JE, Tiro JA. Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals. J Am Med Informatics Assoc. 2016;23:627–634.

Publication types