Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 May:92:313-322.
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.01.042. Epub 2023 Feb 4.

Mortality Conversations Between Male Veterans and Their Providers Prior to Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

Affiliations
Review

Mortality Conversations Between Male Veterans and Their Providers Prior to Dysvascular Lower Extremity Amputation

Alison W Henderson et al. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 May.

Abstract

Background: Among patients facing lower extremity amputation due to dysvascular disease, the mortality risk is very high. Given this, as well as the importance of a patient-centered approach to medical care, informing patients about their possible risk of dying may be important during preoperative shared decision-making. The goal of this investigation was to gain an understanding of patient and provider experiences discussing mortality within the context of amputation within the Veterans Health Administration.

Methods: Semistructured interviews were performed with Veterans with peripheral arterial disease and/or diabetes, vascular and podiatric surgeons, and physical medicine and rehabilitation physicians. Interviews were analyzed using team-based content analysis to identify themes related to amputation-level decisions.

Results: We interviewed 22 patients and 21 surgeons and physicians and identified 3 themes related to conversations around mortality: (1) both patients and providers report that mortality conversations are not common prior to amputation; (2) while most providers find value in mortality conversations, some express concerns around engaging in these discussions with patients; and (3) some patients perceive mortality conversations as unnecessary, but many are open to engaging in the conversation.

Conclusions: Providers may benefit from introducing the topic with patients, including providing the context for why mortality conversations may be valuable, with the understanding that patients can always decline to participate should they not be interested or comfortable discussing this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None

References

    1. Fortington LV, et al., Short and long term mortality rates after a lower limb amputation. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2013. 46(1): p. 124–131. - PubMed
    1. Norvell DC, et al., Mortality prediction following non-traumatic amputation of the lower extremity. British Journal of Surgery, 2019. 106(7): p. 879–888. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeCarlo C, et al., Statin use and other factors associated with mortality after major lower extremity amputation. Journal of vascular surgery, 2017. 66(1): p. 216–225. - PubMed
    1. Yammine K, Hayek F, and Assi C, A meta-analysis of mortality after minor amputation among patients with diabetes and/or peripheral vascular disease. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 2020. 72(6): p. 2197–2207. - PubMed
    1. Robbins JM, et al., Mortality Rates and Diabetic Foot Ulcersls it Time to Communicate Mortality Risk to Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulceration? Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, 2008. 98(6): p. 489–493. - PubMed