Adapting to Evolving Technologies and Treatment Guidelines in a Procedural Trial: A Qualitative Review of the CREST-2 Experience
- PMID: 36746636
- PMCID: PMC10259285
- DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207075
Adapting to Evolving Technologies and Treatment Guidelines in a Procedural Trial: A Qualitative Review of the CREST-2 Experience
Abstract
Multiple challenges confront procedural trials, including slow enrollment, lack of equipoise among patients and physicians, and failure to achieve adequate masking. Nonetheless, randomized clinical trials provide the best evidence of efficacy. The evolution of technology, techniques, and standards of care during the conduct of procedural trials challenges external validity. In this study, we review how a multicenter trial of revascularization of asymptomatic carotid arteries for stroke prevention has managed changes in treating carotid stenosis and medical management of atherothrombotic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02089217.
Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.
Conflict of interest statement
J.F. Meschia receives National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. B.K. Lal receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. G.S. Roubin receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. In addition, he has equity holdings in Contego Medical Inc., Inspire MD Inc., Excision Medical Inc., and CardioMech Inc. T.N. Turan receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. V.J. Howard receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. R.T. Benson reports no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. K. Carman receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. G. Howard receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. T.G. Brott receives NINDS grant support for efforts on the CREST-2 trial. Go to
Figures


Similar articles
-
Carotid revascularization and medical management for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: Protocol of the CREST-2 clinical trials.Int J Stroke. 2017 Oct;12(7):770-778. doi: 10.1177/1747493017706238. Epub 2017 May 2. Int J Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28462683 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Factors Associated With Time to Site Activation, Randomization, and Enrollment Performance in a Stroke Prevention Trial.Stroke. 2017 Sep;48(9):2511-2518. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016976. Epub 2017 Aug 2. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28768800 Free PMC article.
-
Costs and cost-effectiveness of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy for patients at standard surgical risk: results from the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy Versus Stenting Trial (CREST).Stroke. 2012 Sep;43(9):2408-16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.661355. Epub 2012 Jul 19. Stroke. 2012. PMID: 22821614 Free PMC article.
-
Update on the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stent Trial (CREST) protocol.J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Jan;194(1 Suppl):S9-14. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(01)01078-x. J Am Coll Surg. 2002. PMID: 11800361 Review. No abstract available.
-
Critical analysis of the literature and standards of reporting on stroke after carotid revascularization.J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):363-371.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.055. Epub 2021 Jun 26. J Vasc Surg. 2022. PMID: 34182024
References
-
- Eckstein HH, Reiff T, Ringleb P, Jansen O, Mansmann U, Hacke W. SPACE-2: a missed opportunity to compare carotid endarterectomy, carotid stenting, and best medical treatment in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenoses. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51(6):761-765. doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.005. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical