Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 20:10:195-205.
doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2023.01.008. eCollection 2023.

Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy

Affiliations
Review

Preliminary toxicological assessment of heated tobacco products: A review of the literature and proposed strategy

Ruth Dempsey et al. Toxicol Rep. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Heated tobacco products (HTP) have become increasingly common in many countries worldwide. The principle of heating tobacco, without combustion, to produce a nicotine-containing aerosol with remarkably reduced levels of other known toxins, compared to combusted tobacco cigarettes, is now well established. As these products are intended as alternatives to traditional combusted products, during the early stages of their development, it is important for manufacturers to ensure that the design of the product does not lead to any unintentionally increased or new risk for the consumer, compared to the traditional products that consumers seek to replace. There is limited guidance from tobacco product regulations concerning the requirements for performing such preliminary toxicological assessments. Here, we review the published literature on studies performed on HTPs in the pursuit of such data, outline a proposed approach that is consistent with regulatory requirements, and provide a logical approach to the preliminary toxicological assessment of HTPs.

Keywords: Heated tobacco products; Product assessment; Product stewardship; Toxicological assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Decision tree flow chart describing a preliminary toxicology assessment process for heated tobacco products. Please refer to the main text for full description of the steps.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Auer R., Concha-Lozano N., Jacot-Sadowski I., Cornuz J., Berthet A. Heat-not-burn tobacco cigarettes: smoke by any other name. JAMA Intern. Med. 2017;177(7):1050–1052. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.1419. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Banks E., Martin M., Harris M. Framework for the public health assessment of electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control. 2021 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056271. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bekki K., Inaba Y., Uchiyama S., Kunugita N. Comparison of chemicals in mainstream smoke in heat-not-burn tobacco and combustion cigarettes. J. UOEH. 2017;39(3):201–207. doi: 10.7888/juoeh.39.201. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berman M.L., Connolly G., Cummings M.K., et al. Providing a science base for the evaluation of tobacco products. Tob. Regul. Sci. 2015;1(1):76–93. doi: 10.18001/TRS.1.1.8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertrand P., Bonnarme V., Piccirilli A., et al. Physical and chemical assessment of 1,3 Propanediol as a potential substitute of propylene glycol in refill liquid for electronic cigarettes. Sci. Rep. 2018;8(1):10702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29066-6. - DOI - PMC - PubMed