Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023;43(1):19.
doi: 10.1007/s13593-023-00874-z. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Ecological quality as a coffee quality enhancer. A review

Affiliations
Review

Ecological quality as a coffee quality enhancer. A review

Vania Torrez et al. Agron Sustain Dev. 2023.

Abstract

As both coffee quality and sustainability become increasingly important, there is growing interest in understanding how ecological quality affects coffee quality. Here we analyze, for the first time, the state of evidence that ecological quality, in terms of biodiversity and ecosystem functions, impacts the quality of Coffea arabica and C. canephora, based on 78 studies. The following ecosystem functions were included: pollination; weed, disease, and pest control; water and soil fertility regulation. Biodiversity was described by the presence, percentage, and diversity of shade trees. Coffee quality was described by the green bean physical characteristics, biochemical compounds, and organoleptic characteristics. The presence and diversity of shade trees positively impacted bean size and weight and reduced the percentage of rejected beans, but these observations were not consistent over different altitudes. In fact, little is known about the diversity of shade trees and their influence on biochemical compounds. All biochemical compounds varied with the presence of shade, percentage of shade, and elevation. Coffee beans from more diverse tree shade plantations obtained higher scores for final total organoleptic quality than simplified tree shade and unshaded plantations. Decreasing ecological quality diminished ecosystem functions such as pollination, which in turn negatively affected bean quality. Shade affected pests and diseases in different ways, but weeds were reduced. High soil quality positively affected coffee quality. Shade improved the water use efficiency, such that coffee plants were not water stressed and coffee quality was improved. While knowledge on the influence of shade trees on overall coffee quality remains scarce, there is evidence that agroecosystem simplification is negatively correlated with coffee quality. Given global concerns about biodiversity and habitat loss, we recommend that the overall definition of coffee quality include measures of ecological quality, although these aspects are not always detectable in certain coffee quality characteristics or the final cup.

Keywords: Agroforestry; Biochemical compounds; Biodiversity; Coffea; Ecosystem functions; Final cup; Organoleptic characteristics; Physical characteristics; Shade tree diversity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coffee agroforestry systems with diverse tree shade. Photo credit: Vania Torrez.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Definition of ecological quality for this review.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Geographical distribution of publications regarding the effects of ecological quality on coffee quality. The country is understood as the location of the field site (n=78).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aguilar V, Staver C, Milberg P. Weed vegetation response to chemical and manual selective ground cover management in a shaded coffee plantation. Weed Res. 2003;43:68–75. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3180.2003.00318.x. - DOI
    1. Allinne C, Savary S, Avelino J. Delicate balance between pest and disease injuries, yield performance, and other ecosystem services in the complex coffee-based systems of Costa Rica. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 2016;222:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.001. - DOI
    1. Alpizar E, Vaast P, Bertrand B. Proceedings of 20th International Conference on Coffee Science. India: Bangalore; 2005. Fat content: a quality indicator for Central America coffee? pp. 1074–1076.
    1. Alves AL, Pessoa MS, de Souza PEN, et al. Influence of environmental and microclimate factors on the coffee beans quality (C. canephora): correlation between chemical analysis and stable free radicals. Agric Sci. 2018;09:1173–1187. doi: 10.4236/as.2018.99082. - DOI
    1. Angermeier P, Karr J. Ecosystem Management. New York, NY: Springer; 1994. Biological integrity versus biological diversity as policy directives: protecting biotic resources; pp. 264–275.

LinkOut - more resources