Authors' reply to Sabour S. "The 4-step STANDING algorithm for predicting central causes of vertigo; methodological issues on reliability, validity, and prediction"
- PMID: 36748126
- DOI: 10.1111/acem.14676
Authors' reply to Sabour S. "The 4-step STANDING algorithm for predicting central causes of vertigo; methodological issues on reliability, validity, and prediction"
Comment on
-
The 4-step STANDING algorithm for predicting central causes of vertigo: Methodologic issues on reliability, validity and prediction.Acad Emerg Med. 2023 May;30(5):606-607. doi: 10.1111/acem.14674. Epub 2023 Feb 24. Acad Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 36727819 No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Gerlier C, Fels A, Vitaux H, et al. Effectiveness and reliability of the 4-step STANDING algorithm performed by emergency interns and seniors for predicting central causes of vertigo. Acad Emerg Med. 2023. doi:10.1111/acem.14659
-
- Roldán-Nofuentes JA. Compbdt: an R program to compare two binary diagnostic tests subject to a paired design. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):143.
-
- Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.
-
- Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. The problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543-549.
-
- Shankar V, Bangdiwala SI. Observer agreement paradoxes in 2x2 tables: comparison of agreement measures. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):100.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
