Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb;51(1):58-61.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12786. Epub 2023 Feb 7.

Challenges in operationalizing conceptual models in aetiological research

Roger Keller Celeste  1 , Beatriz Carriconde Colvara  1 , Rafaela Soares Rech  2 , Michael Eduardo Reichenheim  3 , João Luiz Bastos  4
Affiliations

Challenges in operationalizing conceptual models in aetiological research

Roger Keller Celeste et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2023 Feb.

Abstract

Conceptual or theoretical models are crucial in developing causal hypotheses and interpreting study findings, but they have been underused and misused in aetiological research, particularly in dentistry and oral epidemiology. Good models should incorporate updated evidence and clarify knowledge gaps to derive logical hypotheses. Developing models and deriving testable hypotheses in operational models can be challenging, as seen in the four examples referred to in this commentary. One challenge concerns the theoretical validity of the model, while another relates to difficulties in operationalizing abstract concepts. A third challenge refers to the lack of sufficient information in the dataset to test partially or even the whole model. Finally, a common challenge is the application of a conceptual model to different contexts. Among the existing methodological approaches to operationalize conceptual models, causal graphs may be helpful, especially when combined with approaches from diverse disciplinary fields via triangulation.

Keywords: causality; epidemiologic methods; public health dentistry; research; theoretical models.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Celeste RK, Broadbent JM, Moyses SJ. Half-century of dental public health research: bibliometric analysis of world scientific trends. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016;44(6):557-563.
    1. Baker SR, Gibson BG. Social oral epidemi(olog)2y where next: one small step or one giant leap? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2014;42(6):481-494.
    1. Frigg R, Hartmann S. Models in science. In: Zalta EN, ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University; 2020. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2020/entries/models-science. Accessed 2020 May 10 Spring 202.
    1. Varpio L, Paradis E, Uijtdehaage S, Young M. The distinctions between theory, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework. Acad Med. 2020;95(7):989-994.
    1. Reichenheim ME, Moraes CL. Pillars for assessing validity in epidemiological studies. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 1998;1(2):131-148.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources