Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes of Airway Versus Non-Airway Pediatric Extubation Failure

Abstract

Background: Pediatric extubation failure is associated with morbidity and mortality. The most common cause is upper-airway obstruction. Subglottic edema is common, but upper-airway obstruction can occur from the oral cavity to the trachea. Dichotomous categorization of extubation failure as airway versus non-airway may help identify risk factors as well as strategies that translate to lower extubation failure rates.

Methods: This was as single-center, retrospective cohort study of invasive mechanical ventilation encounters within a quality improvement database between October 1, 2017-November 30, 2020. Utilizing a 3-physician adjudication process, all extubation failures were categorized as airway versus non-airway. Primary outcome was failure subtype prevalence. Secondary outcome was failure subtype risk factors. Clinical outcomes were explored.

Results: The all-cause extubation failure rate was 10% in a cohort of 844 encounters. Airway and non-airway extubation failure represented 60.7% and 39.3%, respectively. Most airway failures were due to upper-airway obstruction (84.3%)-35.3% were supraglottic, 25.5% subglottic, and 23.5% mixed. Other causes of airway failure were airway patency/secretions (11.8%) and aspiration (3.9%). Non-airway failures were attributed to respiratory failure (75.8%), encephalopathy (15.2%), and other (9%). All-cause extubation failure was associated with dysgenetic/syndromic comorbidity (P = .005), ≥ 3 concurrent comorbid conditions (P = .007), indication for invasive ventilation (P < .001), and longer invasive mechanical ventilation duration (P < .001). Airway extubation failure was significantly associated with the presence of a respiratory comorbidity (P = .01) and Glasgow coma scale < 10 (P = .02). No significant non-airway failure risk factors were identified. Longer pediatric ICU (PICU) stay (P < .001) and PICU mortality (P < .001) were associated with all-cause extubation failure. No significant outcome associations with extubation failure subtype were identified.

Conclusions: Airway extubation failure prevalence was 1.5 times higher than non-airway failure. Potential risk factors for airway failure were identified. These findings are hypothesis generating for future study focused on key evidence gaps and pragmatic bedside application.

Keywords: airway obstruction; extubation; laryngeal edema; mechanical ventilation; pediatrics; stridor.

Fig. 1.

Airway versus non-airway extubation failure etiology definitions. ETT = endotracheal tube.

Fig. 2.

Flow chart. Final outcomes are shaded in gray. ^aOne subject was re-intubated at 49 h (thus meeting success definition) and ultimately had a tracheostomy placed without additional extubation attempts.

Fig. 3.

Comparison of practices at first and second planned extubation stratified by subjects experiencing A: airway failure at first extubation and B: non-airway failure at first extubation; P values are shown where value was ≤ .10. NIV = noninvasive ventilation, HFNC = high-flow nasal cannula.