Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e064291.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064291.

Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK - a mixed-methods, realist evaluation

Hannah Rayment-Jones  1 , Kathryn Dalrymple  2 , James M Harris  3 , Angela Harden  4 , Elidh Parslow  5 , Thomas Georgi  6 , Jane Sandall  2
Affiliations
Observational Study

Project20: maternity care mechanisms that improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors in the UK - a mixed-methods, realist evaluation

Hannah Rayment-Jones et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate how women access and engage with different models of maternity care, whether specialist models improve access and engagement for women with social risk factors, and if so, how?

Design: Realist evaluation.

Setting: Two UK maternity service providers.

Participants: Women accessing maternity services in 2019 (n=1020).

Methods: Prospective observational cohort with multinomial regression analysis to compare measures of access and engagement between models and place of antenatal care. Realist informed, longitudinal interviews with women accessing specialist models of care were analysed to identify mechanisms.

Main outcome measures: Measures of access and engagement, healthcare-seeking experiences.

Results: The number of social risk factors women were experiencing increased with deprivation score, with the most deprived more likely to receive a specialist model that provided continuity of care. Women attending hospital-based antenatal care were more likely to access maternity care late (risk ratio (RR) 2.51, 95% CI 1.33 to 4.70), less likely to have the recommended number of antenatal appointments (RR 0.61, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.99) and more likely to have over 15 appointments (RR 4.90, 95% CI 2.50 to 9.61) compared with community-based care. Women accessing standard care (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) and black women (RR 0.02, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.11) were less likely to have appointments with a known healthcare professional compared with the specialist model. Qualitative data revealed mechanisms for improved access and engagement including self-referral, relational continuity with a small team of midwives, flexibility and situating services within deprived community settings.

Conclusion: Inequalities in access and engagement with maternity care appears to have been mitigated by the community-based specialist model that provided continuity of care. The findings enabled the refinement of a realist programme theory to inform those developing maternity services in line with current policy.

Keywords: Organisation of health services; PRIMARY CARE; PUBLIC HEALTH; SOCIAL MEDICINE.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Programme theory (PT) refinement process leading to context+mechanism=outcome (CMO) configuration.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quantitative data collection flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO) . WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience: summary; 2018. - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) . Antenatal care. quality standard [QS22]; 2012.
    1. Nam JY, Cho E, Park EC. Do severe maternal morbidity and adequate prenatal care affect the delivery cost? A nationwide cohort study for 11 years with follow up. BJOG 2019;126:1623–31. 10.1111/1471-0528.15895 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Renfrew MJ, McFadden A, Bastos MH, et al. . Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. Lancet 2014;384:1129–45. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shaw D, Guise J-M, Shah N, et al. . Drivers of maternity care in high-income countries: can health systems support woman-centred care? Lancet 2016;388:2282–95. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31527-6 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources