Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Feb 7;13(2):e066742.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066742.

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review

Naomi Niznick  1 , Ronda Lun  2 , Brian Dewar  3 , Jeffrey Perry  3   4 , Dar Dowlatshahi  2   3 , Michel Shamy  2   3
Affiliations

Advance consent for participation in randomised controlled trials for emergency conditions: a scoping review

Naomi Niznick et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: Advance consent is a recognised method of obtaining informed consent for participation in research, whereby a potential participant provides consent for future involvement in a study contingent on qualifying for the study's inclusion criteria on a later date. The goal of this study is to map the existing literature on the use of advance consent for enrolment in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for emergency conditions.

Design: Scoping review designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines.

Data sources: We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Register of Clinical Trials from inception to 10 February 2020.

Eligibility criteria: Eligible studies included articles that discussed or employed the use of advance consent for enrolment in RCTs related to emergency conditions. There were no restrictions on the type of eligible study. Data were extracted directly from included papers using a standardised data charting form. We produced a narrative review including article type and authors' dispositions towards advance consent.

Results: Our search yielded 1039 titles with duplicates removed. Six articles met inclusion criteria. Three articles discussed the theoretical use of research advance directives in emergency conditions; one article evaluated stakeholders' perceptions of advance consent; and one article described a method for patients to document their preferences for participation in future research. Only one study employed advance consent to enrol participants into a clinical trial for an emergency condition.

Conclusion: Our review demonstrates that there has been minimal exploration of advance consent for enrolment in RCTs for emergency conditions. Future studies could aim to assess the acceptability of advance consent to participants, along with the feasibility of enrolling research participants using this method of consent.

Protocol: The protocol for this scoping review was published a priori.

Keywords: ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY MEDICINE; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEUROLOGY.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dickert NW, Brown J, Cairns CB, et al. . Confronting ethical and regulatory challenges of emergency care research with conscious patients. Ann Emerg Med 2016;67:538–45. 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.10.026 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mangset M, Førde R, Nessa J, et al. . I don’t like that, it’s tricking people too much… acute informed consent to participation in a trial of thrombolysis for stroke. J Med Ethics 2008;34:751–6. 10.1136/jme.2007.023168 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wendler D, Dickert NW, Silbergleit R, et al. . Targeted consent for research on standard of care interventions in the emergency setting. Crit Care Med 2017;45:e105–10. 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002023 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, et al. . Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1019–30. 10.1056/NEJMoa1414905 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shamy MCF, Dewar B, Chevrier S, et al. . Deferral of consent in acute stroke trials. Stroke 2019;50:1017–20. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024096 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources