Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Sep;18(3):206-216.
doi: 10.5114/aic.2022.122032. Epub 2022 Dec 17.

Catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy

Affiliations
Review

Catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy

Shi-Min Yuan. Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2022 Sep.

Abstract

Introduction: Refractory arrhythmias during pregnancy pose challenges to physicians.

Aim: To give an overview of catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias during pregnancy, and to discuss the indications of the procedure and the outcomes of both mother and fetus.

Material and methods: The study materials were based on comprehensive literature retrieval of the pertinent articles published since 2000.

Results: The indications for catheter ablation were refractory arrhythmias unresponsive to drug therapy in most of the cases followed by requirement of cardioversion. Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia was the most common arrhythmia developed during pregnancy. Pregnancy complications were present in 2.4% of the cases. There was no mortality among the pregnant patients. Fetal adverse events occurred in 3.1% of the cases, more in the fluoroscopy than in the zero-fluoroscopy group. The patient cohort with a radiation dose of > 50 mGy in one-third of the cases had a 14.3% fetal adverse event rate. Fetal adverse events occurred only in the second trimester, not in the other two trimesters.

Conclusions: Drug-refractory and poorly tolerated tachycardias in pregnant patients warrant catheter ablation. Zero-fluoroscopy technique under guidance with three-dimensional mapping systems is preferred and strict minimal fluoroscopy is only used in extreme necessity. As ablation in the second trimester was associated with a probable higher fetal adverse event rate, it is suggested that ablation is preferably performed in the third trimester.

Keywords: catheter ablation; fluoroscopy; pregnancy; supraventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of literature inclusion and exclusion
Figure 2
Figure 2
Protocol of a multidisciplinary team in managing tachyarrhythmias in a pregnant patient 3D – three-dimensional, ICE – intracardiac echocardiography, M-F – maternal-fetal medicine, pt – patient, TEE – transesophageal echocardiography.

References

    1. Bigelow AM, Crane SS, Khoury FR, et al. . Catheter ablation of supraventricular tachycardia without fluoroscopy during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125: 1338-41. - PubMed
    1. Wu H, Ling LH, Lee G, et al. . Successful catheter ablation of incessant atrial tachycardia in pregnancy using three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping with minimal radiation. Intern Med J 2012; 42: 709-12. - PubMed
    1. Szumowski L, Szufladowicz E, Orczykowski M, et al. . Ablation of severe drug-resistant tachyarrhythmia during pregnancy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2010; 21: 877-82. - PubMed
    1. Zuberi Z, Silberbauer J, Murgatroyd F. Successful non-fluoroscopic radiofrequency ablation of incessant atrial tachycardia in a high risk twin pregnancy. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J 2014; 14: 26-31. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Enriquez AD, Economy KE, Tedrow UB. Contemporary management of arrhythmias during pregnancy. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 2014; 7: 961-7. - PubMed