Cost-effectiveness of 82-Rubidium PET myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia depending on the prevalence of coronary artery disease
- PMID: 36752899
- PMCID: PMC9908793
- DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00954-x
Cost-effectiveness of 82-Rubidium PET myocardial perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia depending on the prevalence of coronary artery disease
Abstract
Background: 82-Rubidium-Positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (Rb-PET-MPI) offers higher diagnostic performance for the detection of myocardial ischemia compared to Tc-SPECT-MPI. The aim of this economic evaluation was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of Rb-PET-MPI versus Tc-SPECT-MPI in patients with suspected myocardial ischemia according to pretest probabilities (PTP) of obstructive coronary artery disease based on the results of the RUBIS Trial.
Methods: Costs and effectiveness were calculated for all patients over 1 year and an incremental analysis of differences in costs and effectiveness in terms of diagnostic accuracy was performed. The uncertainty of the results was estimated using bootstrap. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the French health care system with a time horizon of 12 months.
Results: The average cost of a Rb-PET-MPI-based strategy for the detection of myocardial ischemia was €219 lower than a SPECT-MPI-based strategy (€1192 (± 1834) vs €973 (± 1939), p < 0.01). The one-year incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was negative: - €2730 (money saved per additional accurate diagnosis) in patients presenting PTP > 15% for the Rb-PET-MPI vs. Tc-SPECT-MPI strategy. Analysis of the joint distribution of costs and outcomes found that the Rb-PET-MPI strategy had a 92% probability to be dominant (cost-saving and outcome-improving).
Conclusions: Rb-PET-MPI is cost-effective compared to Tc-SPECT-MPI for the detection of myocardial ischemia in patients with PTP > 15% of obstructive coronary artery disease.
Trial registration: RUBIS Trial registration: NCT01679886, Registered 03 September 2012, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01679886 .
Keywords: 82-Rubidium PET; Cost-effectiveness; Myocardial perfusion imaging; Obstructive coronary artery disease; SPECT.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Fabien Hyafil is Consultant for Naogen, Curium Pharma, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Novo Nordisk and shareholder of Naogen. The other authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Agostini D, Roule V, Nganoa C, Roth N, Baavour R, Parienti JJ, Beygui F, Manrique A. First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45(7):1079–1090. doi: 10.1007/s00259-018-3958-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Acampa W, Zampella E, Assante R, Genova A, De Simini G, Mannarino T, D'Antonio A, Gaudieri V, Nappi C, Buongiorno P, Mainolfi CG, Petretta M, Cuocolo A. Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT-SPECT: a head to head comparison with 82Rubidium PET imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28(6):2827–2839. doi: 10.1007/s12350-020-02129-w. - DOI - PubMed
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
